정당해산심판 결정의 유형과 법적 효과

The ban of a political party should be carried out strictly limited in all the procedures of sue, complaint, hearing and execution. The quotation decision can be only justified in the case of organized party's clear and present danger is threatening democratic basic order. The first legal effect is compulsory winding-up the party. However, if this party's property is based on the members of it, there is no useful way of forfeit the properties. There will be a mechanism to correct any error of the Constitutional Court's decision by people's political fundamental rights exercise. For this reason, it is proved that Rallies and Demonstrations Law has few justification of prohibiting any rally or demonstration for achieving winded up political party's purpose. There are must be constitutional reason to deprive of congressmen's status because they are the part of constitutional institutions. If there were any other Korean constitution's intent concerned about depriving of congressmen's status, it would be any provisions of it. However, there is only explaining about free delegation of congressmen's conscience. The ban of party has a strong chilling effect which brings the people barely express his own opinion and finally it will shrink the spectrum of democracy. So, I suggest that it would be better including every parties in the democratic political process by natural selection to receive the judgment of the people. I believe, in this way, keeping the length of democracy healthfully.