애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문한국경영과학회지2022.11 발행KCI 피인용 2

다기준 의사결정을 위한 수리모형 기반의 방법론:계층적 분석기법과의 비교관점

Mathematical Model based Methodology for Multi-Criterion Decision Making: Comparative Point of View with Analytical Hierarchical Process

안남수(육군사관학교); 정자훈(육군사관학교)

47권 4호, 17~31쪽

초록

In this study, a mathematical model-based methodology for multi-criteria decision making is presented. Although AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) is the most widely used decision-making technique, there are some practical limitations such as inconsistent survey response and long-time survey response due to the use of a 9-point scale. In this study, a new methodology is presented to overcome this problem. In the first stage of the methodology, the priority between criterion is obtained. In the second stage, the priority between the alternatives of the criterion is derived, and in the final stage, the maximum achievable aggregate importance of each alternative is calculated while maintaining the obtained two priorities. Decision makers only need to select the alternative with the highest overall importance. As the survey respondent only needs to select one of the two options, it is possible to cut the survey response time and reduce the psychological burden. From the experimental results, it was confirmed that the results of this study can be applied to the actual decision-making problems.

Abstract

In this study, a mathematical model-based methodology for multi-criteria decision making is presented. Although AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) is the most widely used decision-making technique, there are some practical limitations such as inconsistent survey response and long-time survey response due to the use of a 9-point scale. In this study, a new methodology is presented to overcome this problem. In the first stage of the methodology, the priority between criterion is obtained. In the second stage, the priority between the alternatives of the criterion is derived, and in the final stage, the maximum achievable aggregate importance of each alternative is calculated while maintaining the obtained two priorities. Decision makers only need to select the alternative with the highest overall importance. As the survey respondent only needs to select one of the two options, it is possible to cut the survey response time and reduce the psychological burden. From the experimental results, it was confirmed that the results of this study can be applied to the actual decision-making problems.

발행기관:
한국경영과학회
분류:
경영학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
다기준 의사결정을 위한 수리모형 기반의 방법론:계층적 분석기법과의 비교관점 | 한국경영과학회지 2022 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI