한국과 미국의 인사개혁 비교 연구

The purpose of this study is to suggest useful implications by comparing the civil service reform between Korea and U.S.A. Based upon systematic literature review, this study compare three main tenets between two countries: the ideological orientation of civil service reform, the category of reform agenda and the degree of innovation, and the model of civil service reform. The results of the comparative study of the civil service reform show that first of all, the ideological orientation of civil service reform of Korea and U.S.A is commonly efficiency and effectiveness performance-oriented, but there are some differences in the aspects of social equity and representative enactments. Second, the category of reform agendas has not been systematic at large rather commonly has focused on the specific policies, rules, or techniques, while the degree of innovation and impact has been various in every levels of government. Finally, the models of civil service reform is somewhat divert in U.S.A., while those of Korea is more homogeneous model by simply focusing on the conventional wisdom such as top-down ways or the emphasizing the role of central personnel agency.