애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문경영법률2010.01 발행KCI 피인용 8

주주의 지위 -주주중심주의의 비판적 고찰-

The Status of a Shareholder: A Critical Study on the Shareholder Primacy Doctrine

이동승(상지대학교)

20권 2호, 325~360쪽

초록

This article is about the shareholder primacy doctrine and owner- theory. Traditionally legal scholarship has recognized the shareholder primacy doctrine as a leading principle which governs corporate law. But this article challenges that recognition on the ground that the shareholder primacy doctrine can not afford to cope with recent global crises and corporate corruptions. The shareholder primacy doctrine can not be reasoned only from contractarian theory in the common law jurisdictions, but from owner-theory in the civil law jurisdictions. But the reasoning of two theories is not appropriate in that a corporation is not a nexus, but a legal entity separated from it's shareholders, and a corporation can not be owned by anyone. More important thing to notice is that the theories are not designed to solve the foregoing the issues (global crises and corporate corruption), because the contractarian theory denies corporate social responsibility and the owner-theory makes it a rule for a corporation to pursue maximizing interests of shareholders.

Abstract

This article is about the shareholder primacy doctrine and owner- theory. Traditionally legal scholarship has recognized the shareholder primacy doctrine as a leading principle which governs corporate law. But this article challenges that recognition on the ground that the shareholder primacy doctrine can not afford to cope with recent global crises and corporate corruptions. The shareholder primacy doctrine can not be reasoned only from contractarian theory in the common law jurisdictions, but from owner-theory in the civil law jurisdictions. But the reasoning of two theories is not appropriate in that a corporation is not a nexus, but a legal entity separated from it's shareholders, and a corporation can not be owned by anyone. More important thing to notice is that the theories are not designed to solve the foregoing the issues (global crises and corporate corruption), because the contractarian theory denies corporate social responsibility and the owner-theory makes it a rule for a corporation to pursue maximizing interests of shareholders.

발행기관:
한국경영법률학회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
주주의 지위 -주주중심주의의 비판적 고찰- | 경영법률 2010 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI