애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문민사소송2010.11 발행KCI 피인용 16

의료분쟁의 합리적 해결을 위한 연구

A study on rational solutions of the medical dispute

정영수(가톨릭대학교)

14권 2호, 622~661쪽

초록

The medical dispute has been social issue in our country. The medical dispute could be solved by the judgement of a court as other kinds of disputes. But a solution by the judgement of a court might cause the cost disadvantage to the patient. Besides, it has a bad effect on confidence between the patient and physician. So it needs the alternative dispute resolution(ADR) for a rational solution of the medical dispute. We have introduced various out of court dispute settlement mechanisms during the last 15 years, and to no vail, and recently proposed Medical Disputes Adjustment Act. This paper focuses on an effective approach to dealing with the medical dispute, and describes out of court medical malpractice litigation systems in Japan, Germany and US, for example, binding arbitration, screening panel and mediation in US. And it is important that why patients tend to sue medical providers and how lack of communicated information between physicians and patients. Allowing physicians to explain what happened and apologize or express regret and creating opportunity for the rebuilding of patient-physician relationships may lead to prevention of the medical litigation.

Abstract

The medical dispute has been social issue in our country. The medical dispute could be solved by the judgement of a court as other kinds of disputes. But a solution by the judgement of a court might cause the cost disadvantage to the patient. Besides, it has a bad effect on confidence between the patient and physician. So it needs the alternative dispute resolution(ADR) for a rational solution of the medical dispute. We have introduced various out of court dispute settlement mechanisms during the last 15 years, and to no vail, and recently proposed Medical Disputes Adjustment Act. This paper focuses on an effective approach to dealing with the medical dispute, and describes out of court medical malpractice litigation systems in Japan, Germany and US, for example, binding arbitration, screening panel and mediation in US. And it is important that why patients tend to sue medical providers and how lack of communicated information between physicians and patients. Allowing physicians to explain what happened and apologize or express regret and creating opportunity for the rebuilding of patient-physician relationships may lead to prevention of the medical litigation.

발행기관:
한국민사소송법학회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
의료분쟁의 합리적 해결을 위한 연구 | 민사소송 2010 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI