애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문민사소송2011.05 발행KCI 피인용 2

미국 민사소송에서 소송비용의 재판에 대한 불복방법

조수혜(헌법재판소)

15권 1호, 242~279쪽

초록

Despite costs shall be allowed to the prevailing party in principle, the court is vested with the discretion in awarding costs in some exceptional cases. However, it is prohibited to appeal from the judgment that regards costs only under the Civil Procedure Act of Korea, implying there are no methods to control the discretion of the court with regard to costs, while it may matter to parties. While the provision that denies the appealability of decisions regarding costs only has been attacked, its legitimacy has been confirmed by the two highest courts in Korea, the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. Nonetheless, it would be desirable to consider the way to respect the right to appeal of parties, while securing the efficiency of the Judiciary. This paper employed a comparative methodology in studying the provision: The appealability of decisions regarding costs only in the U.S. courts has been researched to detect any implication to our system. Based on the comparison of the costs appealing system of Korea and the U.S., this paper makes some suggestions to promote the right to appeal, as well as the efficiency of the Judiciary.

Abstract

Despite costs shall be allowed to the prevailing party in principle, the court is vested with the discretion in awarding costs in some exceptional cases. However, it is prohibited to appeal from the judgment that regards costs only under the Civil Procedure Act of Korea, implying there are no methods to control the discretion of the court with regard to costs, while it may matter to parties. While the provision that denies the appealability of decisions regarding costs only has been attacked, its legitimacy has been confirmed by the two highest courts in Korea, the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court. Nonetheless, it would be desirable to consider the way to respect the right to appeal of parties, while securing the efficiency of the Judiciary. This paper employed a comparative methodology in studying the provision: The appealability of decisions regarding costs only in the U.S. courts has been researched to detect any implication to our system. Based on the comparison of the costs appealing system of Korea and the U.S., this paper makes some suggestions to promote the right to appeal, as well as the efficiency of the Judiciary.

발행기관:
한국민사소송법학회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
미국 민사소송에서 소송비용의 재판에 대한 불복방법 | 민사소송 2011 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI