서울대학교와 캘리포니아 대학의 거버넌스 비교 연구

In this study, led by University of California and Seoul National University, therelationship with the university and nation, university’s internal governance issuesrelated to the subject of autonomy, democracy, and accountability, such as the value ofcomparative analysis compliance, are as follows: First, the Constitution of the Universityof California is more stable than that of Seoul National University, and the financialsupport of the government specified in the law in the case of Seoul National Universitygaining more autonomy would be advantageous. Second, if the governor and legislatureof University of California Regent overly criticize demand operational efficiency, it willinfringe on the autonomy of university. Third, the director of the Seoul NationalUniversity has more democratic value of/ than UC and needs to have a long term ofservice. University of California reflected in a higher value of the accountability than theappointed director of the Seoul National University. Fourth, with multiple campuses witha single board of directors easily get country's autonomy than each campus boardsystem. Campus board of directors gets higher autonomy and democracy. However,regarding efficiency and accountability, a single board of directors system is moreefficient. Fifth, regarding the president appointment, the University of California getshigher accountability and Seoul National University gets higher democracy. Sixth, withhistorical tradition, the University of California governance settles shared governancethrough the delegation of authority.