재무분석가의 경영자 예측공시 분석 경험이 재무분석가 및 경영자의 이익예측공시 정확성에 미치는 영향
The Effect of Analysts' Forecasts Experience on Analyst and Management Earnings Forecasts Accuracy
최승욱(경희대학교)
31권 1호, 159~180쪽
초록
기업 외부의 투자자들이 이익 공시일 전에 당해 이익에 대한 유용한 예측정보로 이용할 수 있는 자발적공시 형태의 정보는 경영자와 재무분석가의 이익예측공시가 있다. 다수의 선행연구들은 기업 내부의 경영자가정보 우위에 있으므로 재무분석가 이익예측공시가 경영자의 예측공시에 의해 영향을 받고 있음을 밝히고있다. 그러나 경영자 역시 시장에서의 피드백을 통해 예측을 수정할 수 있으며, 특히 재무분석가는 일반투자자보다 정교한 시장참여자로서 이들이 제공하는 정보를 경영자가 반영할 가능성이 있다. 본 연구는 과거에 경영자이익예측 공시 기업의 분석보고서를 작성한 경험이 있는 재무분석가를 대상으로 이들 재무분석가들이 보다정확한 이익예측치를 제공하는지 조사한다. 또한 경영자들이 이러한 분석 경험이 있는 재무분석가들의 예측치를 자신의 이익예측치 산정에 고려하고 있는지를 검증한다. 아울러 분석 경험이 있는 재무분석가 이익예측공시가 경영자-재무분석가 간 예측치 차이를 줄이는지를 조사한다. 본 연구의 실증분석 결과, 과거 경영자 예측공시를 추종한 경험이 많은 재무분석가의 이익예측정확성은 그렇지 않은 재무분석가에 비해 높은 것으로 나타났다. 또한 이러한 재무분석가들의 분석보고서 수가 증가할수록 당기의 경영자 이익예측 정확성이 향상되었다. 마지막으로, 이러한 재무분석가들의 경험은 경영자 이익예측치와 재무분석가 이익예측치 간의 차이를 줄이고 있다. 이를 요약하면, 재무분석가의 분석 경험은 이들의 예측치 정확성에 도움을 주고 있다. 또한 경영자들 역시자신의 예측치에 이러한 재무분석가들의 정보를 반영하고 있으며, 재무분석가의 경험은 재무분석가와 경영자간 예측정확성 차이의 감소에도 영향을 주고 있는 것으로 보인다. 본 연구의 공헌점은 다음과 같다. 우선, 재무분석가의 과거 이익예측치 분석 경험이 중요한 인적특성의 하나임을 실증하였다. 둘째, 경영자들이 이익예측활동에 재무분석가의 이익예측을 반영하고 있음을 밝혔다. 이는 Dye & Sridhar(2002), Langberg & Sivaramakrishnan(2010) 등의 이론 연구들이 예측한 것으로 본 연구는 실증분석을 통해 이와 같은 현상이존재함을 밝힌 많지 않은 연구의 하나이다.
Abstract
This paper investigates whether the analysts’ MF-experience affects analysts and management earnings forecasts. MF-experience is defined as the analysts’ experience of analyzing management forecasts of a specific firm that he/she has followed (Hilary & Shen 2013). The voluntary disclosed information available to investors outside the firm as useful predictive information about the performance of the firm before the earnings announcement is disclosed either by a manager or a financial analyst. Most prior studies show that analysts' earnings forecasts disclosure is affected by managerial forecasts disclosure because managers in firms have more superior private information than analysts. This is in line with the fact that most analysts' earnings forecasts are released after the disclosure of managerial earnings forecasts. This one-sided information flow is suggested by the majority of prior research. However, managers can also modify forecasts through market’s feedback (Dye & Sridhar 2002). In particular, managers are more likely to reflect information provided by the financial analysts as they have information superiority than general investors (Brown et al. 1987). For instance, theory suggested by Dye and Sridhar (2002) and Langberg and Sivaramakrishnan (2010) supports this notion. In addition, recent studies have continued to investigate the likelihood that financial analysts will make more accurate predictions than managers (Clement et al. 2007; Hilary & Shen 2013). For instance, Hilary and Shen (2013) find that after the release of a management forecast, the improvement in accuracy of earnings forecasts made by analysts for non-issuing firms in the same industry is an increasing function depend of the seriousness of MF-Experience. In this paper, by following and modifying Hilary and Shen (2013), I argue that not every financial analysts have information superiority than general market participants, but only who have experience of following firms that reported management earnings forecasts are superior to ordinary investors and normal analysts. As mentioned above, these analysts have MF-experience, and I expect that they disclose more accurate earnings forecasts for that firm than other analysts. Futhermore, I examine whether managers consider the forecasts of these analysts in disclosing their own earnings forecasts by testing the association between MF-experience financial analysts and management forecasts accuracy. The empirical results of this study are as follows. As a result of analyzing whether financial analysts disclose more precise earnings forecasts based on their experience following firms that provided past earnings forecast disclosures, the results show that the accuracy of earnings forecasts of MF-experienced financial analysts is higher than that of financial analysts who do not. Also, managers more rely on the experience of these financial analysts. Specifically, as the number of reports of analysts who have followed the disclosure of managerial earnings forecasts in the past increased, the accuracy of managerial earnings forecasts improved. Lastly, the experience of these financial analysts reduces the difference between managerial-analyst earnings estimates bias. Overall, the results of this paper document that both of the analysts and managers consider and reflect forecasts of MF-experienced financial analysts on their own earnings forecasts. The contribution of this study is as follows. First, I find that the analysts' experience of analyzing past earnings forecasts is one of the most important personal characteristics. In other words, the analysts' analysis of managerial earnings forecast disclosures enhances their future forecasting activities. Second, the results show that the earnings forecasts of financial analysts are reflected in managers earnings forecasting activities. As expected from the theoretical studies by Dye and Sridhar (2002) and Langberg and Sivaramakrishnan (2010), I empirically document their theoretical predictions. Overall, these results confirm the information usefulness of financial analyst predictions that not only market participants but also managers use financial analyst earnings forecasts.
- 발행기관:
- 대한경영학회
- 분류:
- 경영학