Q방법론을 활용한 과학기술정책 이행점검체계 구축을 위한 정책선호도에 관한 연구

This study provided implications by analyzing policy preferences for implementation inspection in the field of science and technology. This study is significant in that it suggests the future direction of implementation inspection taking into account the special characteristics of the science and technology field. The results of the analysis suggest that institutional supplementation for learning functions and disclosure of inspection results is important in inspecting the implementation of science and technology policies, and this indicates that it must be strengthened as a necessary institutional support element in the implementation inspection process. First, in order to achieve the purpose of implementation inspection, the learning function and policy utilization must be strengthened. Institutional supplementation is needed for ‘learning function’ and ‘disclosure of inspection results’ as institutional support elements necessary for the process rather than the results of performance inspection performance measurement. Second, efforts should be made to collect diverse opinions to secure procedural legitimacy during the science and technology implementation inspection process, and in particular, focus should be placed on collecting qualitative opinions. As a concrete alternative, the strengthening of ‘qualitative’ methods in collecting opinions is required, and the design of such methods suggests that related methodologies should be designed through the active participation of experts as well as the participation of various stakeholders. This study seeks to make a practical contribution to the implementation and evaluation of science and technology policies by overcoming the limitations of existing studies and clarifying key elements of policy implementation inspection.