인공지능은 회계업무에 (얼마나) 적합한가?: 공인회계사 자격시험을 중심으로
(To What Extent) Can Artificial Intelligence Perform Accounting Tasks?: Evidence from the Certified Public Accountant Examination
김태식(한국공인회계사회 정보화전략본부 본부장); 선우희연(세종대학교); 이우종(서울대학교)
34권 5호, 33~48쪽
초록
인공지능은 인간의 노동을 빠르게 대체하고 있다. 이미 상당부분 대체가 진행된 물리적 노동에 비해 상황에 맞는 전문가적 판단, 직관, 통찰력을 요구하는 인지적 노동에 대한 대체 속도는 비교적 느리다. 본 논문은 대표적 인지 노동 중 하나인 회계전문가의 업무를 인공지능이 얼마나 유효하게 수행할 수 있을지를 공인회계사 자격시험 성적을 토대로 가늠해 본다. 2024년 공인회계사 1차(회계학) 및 2차(재무회계) 시험을 인공지능(chatGPT 4o1)에게 풀이시킨 결과, 1차와 2차에서 각각 90%, 51%의 득점률을 기록하였다. 이는 현재의 인공지능 학습수준으 로도 자격시험이 요구하는 회계전문성의 표준을 상당부분 만족시킬 수 있다는 것을 의미한다. 본 연구의 결과는 공인회계사의 전문성의 범주가 보다 고도의 맥락적 사고를 수행하는 것으로 빠르게 확장되어야 한다는 것을 시사한다. 또한 회계 및 관련분야 공적, 사적 교육기관의 교육목표와 그에 따른 교육과정 또한 근본적으로 재검토되어야 할 필요를 환기한다. 본 연구는 공인회계사 자격시험을 통하여 현단계 인공지능 의 회계적 역량을 가늠하는 탐색적인 연구로서, 인공지능의 역할에 관한 사회적 논의의 일부이다.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly replacing human labor. Physical labor has already been largely replaced. In contrast, cognitive labor, which requires expert judgment, intuition, and insight, has been slower to be replaced. This paper examines the extent to which AI can effectively perform the tasks of accounting professionals, one of the most representative forms of cognitive labor, based on the performance on the Certified Public Accountant (CPA) exam. When AI (ChatGPT 4o1) was tasked with solving the 2024 CPA exams, it achieved a correct answer rate of 90% on the first-tier (accounting) exam. The score is higher than the average score of 53% in the accounting subject obtained by first-tier passers of the 2024 CPA exam. Specifically, the scores of non-computational questions were higher than those of computational questions in each sub-category in the accounting subject. The results suggest that the current level of AI learning is sufficient to meet the basic accounting professional competence required by the qualification exam. The second-tier CPA exam requires applicants to answer multiple essay questions by presenting complex material on a single accounting topic. Therefore, the second-tier financial accounting subject requires more multifaceted and complex cognitive skills than the first-tier accounting subject. When we had ChatGPT 4o1 solve the second-tier financial accounting exam, it resulted in a score of 51%. While the score is below the 60 % absolute cut-off for passing the second exam, it is higher than the 40% cut-off for the minimum requirement applied to the relative assessment. The result that the second test scored lower than the first suggests that even the best AI in 2025 will not be able to fully solve complex and multifaceted accounting problems, which might be more pronounced under the principles-based K-IFRS. Combined, our results suggest both the potential and limitations of AI for accounting expertise. This phenomenon is not limited to Korean qualifying exams. When the initial version of ChatGPT was announced in late 2022, there was much skepticism about the capabilities of AI. This was due to concerns about imperfect accuracy and risks to information security. In a January 2023 experiment solving accounting problems, ChatGPT slightly outperformed human students. However, the AI’s performance improved steeply with each subsequent training session. In May 2023, ChatGPT 3.5 was still unable to pass the US CPA exam. However, since its latest iteration, GPT-4, it has passed the Certified Public Accountant, Certified Management Accountant, Certified Internal Auditor, and Enrolled Agent exams with an average score of 85%. Large accounting firms are accelerating the development and adoption of AI from a strategic perspective. In addition to automating simple repetitive tasks in the external audit process, machine learning is also considered to replace complex judgments required in audit work. In other words, the recent use of artificial intelligence in the auditing process has evolved from simple reliance on existing IT tools to automate the cognitive tasks of auditors. Nevertheless, the acceptance of AI by the accounting workforce is still low. Research shows that while 85% of accounting professionals feel they need to speed up their adoption of technology to remain competitive, many are reluctant to explore data analytics tools beyond Excel. A survey of Korean CPAs reports that CPAs recognize the importance of AI but perceive insufficient investment and training. If AI can perform as well as the accounting expertise of CPAs, however, it could possibly change the career prospects for the profession. More specifically, the social and economic value of the CPA qualification would be diluted when AI successfully delivers accounting expertise. In this regard, our results provide an opportunity for the accounting profession to become specifically aware of the cognitive capabilities of AI and to gauge its potential impact on the CPA labor market. To be specific, our findings imply that the scope of CPA expertise must immediately evolve to encompass more advanced contextual and critical thinking. This study also calls for a fundamental review of the educational objectives and curricula of public and private education institutions in the accounting field. This study serves as an exploratory assessment of AI’s current accounting capabilities through CPA exams and provides a basis for further discussions on the role of AI in the accounting profession.
- 발행기관:
- 한국회계학회
- 분류:
- 회계학