애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문노동법연구2007.06 발행KCI 피인용 25

개정 해고법제의 주요 내용과 그 평가

A Critical Review on the 2006 Dismissal Laws

이철수(서울대학교)

22호, 1~48쪽

초록

The main characteristic of the current amendment on dismissal laws is the introduction of mandatory deposit system for implementation and dismissal compensation system. This amendment can be evaluated in a positive manner on the ground that it ensures the effectiveness of relief order from the Labor Relations Commission and improves the elasticity of relief system. Especially, the amendment to notify a lay-off worker of the cause and time of dismissal in a written form is very desirable because there have been continued disputes between parties on the settlement of factual relation regarding the existence of dismissal measure. Despite this forward-looking amendment of the dismissal law, this paper tries to complement several insufficient aspects of the amendment. First, the diversification of relief method needs to be considered after taking the concept of constructive dismissal in British law into account. Second, we need to contemplate how to reinforce the reconciliation on dispute resolution process. Moreover, in the long run, the labor court needs to be introduced in order to improve the dismissal relief system. Third, dismissal conditions need to be stipulated in a statutory form in order to accept the principle of appropriate dismissal process and to rationally manage the interests between labor and management. Fourth, the period of dismissal notice needs to be adjusted in proportion to the length of service in order to make full use of the function of dismissal notice. Fifth, although the intension of resignation is declared, the revocation should be allowed within a certain period of time(for example, 7 days) in order to secure the legal stability.

Abstract

The main characteristic of the current amendment on dismissal laws is the introduction of mandatory deposit system for implementation and dismissal compensation system. This amendment can be evaluated in a positive manner on the ground that it ensures the effectiveness of relief order from the Labor Relations Commission and improves the elasticity of relief system. Especially, the amendment to notify a lay-off worker of the cause and time of dismissal in a written form is very desirable because there have been continued disputes between parties on the settlement of factual relation regarding the existence of dismissal measure. Despite this forward-looking amendment of the dismissal law, this paper tries to complement several insufficient aspects of the amendment. First, the diversification of relief method needs to be considered after taking the concept of constructive dismissal in British law into account. Second, we need to contemplate how to reinforce the reconciliation on dispute resolution process. Moreover, in the long run, the labor court needs to be introduced in order to improve the dismissal relief system. Third, dismissal conditions need to be stipulated in a statutory form in order to accept the principle of appropriate dismissal process and to rationally manage the interests between labor and management. Fourth, the period of dismissal notice needs to be adjusted in proportion to the length of service in order to make full use of the function of dismissal notice. Fifth, although the intension of resignation is declared, the revocation should be allowed within a certain period of time(for example, 7 days) in order to secure the legal stability.

발행기관:
서울대학교노동법연구회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
개정 해고법제의 주요 내용과 그 평가 | 노동법연구 2007 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI