애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문법과사회2007.06 발행KCI 피인용 3

형사사법과 인권 분야에서 민주화와 법치화의 추세(1987~2007)

From the Military Regime to the Constitutional Criminal Justice since the 1987 Democratic Uprising

한인섭(서울대학교)

32호, 31~65쪽

초록

The 1987 Civil Uprising was a turning point away from the age of authoritarian regime which had dominated the Korean civil society. Military government gave up its iron fists, and democratic transition has been on the process. Now, Korea consolidated its democratic institutions, and the check-and-balance system between power organs has been worked. In the field of criminal justice, the first target was to secure the judicial independence from the power politics. The social control agencies based on the rationale of national security has lost their extraordinary power. Torture and illegal arrest have been withered. Political abuse of death penalty was an ancient episode, and now its execution has been suspended since 1998. The most conspicuous change happened in the sphere of detention and imprisonment. The abuse of detention was diminished, and the rate of imprisonment was gradually diminished. When a citizen wants to make a complaint, (s)he finds that much more judicial remedies are now available: a constitutional complaint, a petition to the Minister of Justice, and a complaint to the National Human Rights Institution. So far as the “manifest" human rights issues are concerned, one can safely say that Koreans are now living in a quite different world compared with the twenty years ago. On the other hand, human rights for minority has been little advanced. Religious minority like “conscientious objection to the militiary service" go to the prison. Hebeas corpus has yet to widen its scope of implementation to the various private sectors of internment. We can say the more conspicuous advances has been recorded in the sphere of the violations of human rights, but there remains a long way to achieve the better conditions for the minority in its various meaning. One alternative is to develop more plural democracy based on the principle of tolerance and diversity.

Abstract

The 1987 Civil Uprising was a turning point away from the age of authoritarian regime which had dominated the Korean civil society. Military government gave up its iron fists, and democratic transition has been on the process. Now, Korea consolidated its democratic institutions, and the check-and-balance system between power organs has been worked. In the field of criminal justice, the first target was to secure the judicial independence from the power politics. The social control agencies based on the rationale of national security has lost their extraordinary power. Torture and illegal arrest have been withered. Political abuse of death penalty was an ancient episode, and now its execution has been suspended since 1998. The most conspicuous change happened in the sphere of detention and imprisonment. The abuse of detention was diminished, and the rate of imprisonment was gradually diminished. When a citizen wants to make a complaint, (s)he finds that much more judicial remedies are now available: a constitutional complaint, a petition to the Minister of Justice, and a complaint to the National Human Rights Institution. So far as the “manifest" human rights issues are concerned, one can safely say that Koreans are now living in a quite different world compared with the twenty years ago. On the other hand, human rights for minority has been little advanced. Religious minority like “conscientious objection to the militiary service" go to the prison. Hebeas corpus has yet to widen its scope of implementation to the various private sectors of internment. We can say the more conspicuous advances has been recorded in the sphere of the violations of human rights, but there remains a long way to achieve the better conditions for the minority in its various meaning. One alternative is to develop more plural democracy based on the principle of tolerance and diversity.

발행기관:
법과사회이론학회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작