애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문성균관법학2007.12 발행KCI 피인용 3

일의 完成 前 都給人의 契約解除와 損害賠償

A Study of the Rescission of Person who Ordered Work Before Its Completion and Calculation of Damages

이우진(한국토지공사)

19권 3호, 729~752쪽

초록

The purpose of this study is analyze that the Right of Rescission of Person who Ordered Work Before Its Completion. Korean Civil Law §673 regulates that before the completion of the contracted work, the person who ordered the work may rescind the contract at any time, but shall be liable for damages. Several foreign countries have the similar effect article that §649 of German Civil Law, §1794 of French Civil Law, §377 of Swiss Obligation Law and §641 of Japanese Civil Law. Supreme Court Decision of Korea "2000Da37296, 37302 Delivered on May 10, 2002" is the first decision that is based on Article 673 of Korean Civil Law. The first summary of this study is when a contract for work is terminated under Article 673 of the Civil Law, it is impossible for the person who ordered work to plead the reduction of the amount of compensation or liquidated damages on the basis of the contractor's fault or contributory negligence. The second summary of this study is when a contract for work is terminated under Article 673 of the Civil Law, the benefit accrued to the contractor as a result of the termination of the contract must be deducted in calculating the damages. When a contract for work is terminated pursuant to Article 673 of the Civil Law, the profits which the contractor has made by using his resources or efforts which became available due to the termination of the contract, or would thus have been able to make(but did not due to his or her laziness or neglect), or could make by utilizing the materials no longer needed due to the termination of the contract in some other uses or by selling them must necessarily be deducted from the amount of compensation. The relating arguments in Germany, Japan is introduced and studied for the comparison with Korean arguments.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is analyze that the Right of Rescission of Person who Ordered Work Before Its Completion. Korean Civil Law §673 regulates that before the completion of the contracted work, the person who ordered the work may rescind the contract at any time, but shall be liable for damages. Several foreign countries have the similar effect article that §649 of German Civil Law, §1794 of French Civil Law, §377 of Swiss Obligation Law and §641 of Japanese Civil Law. Supreme Court Decision of Korea "2000Da37296, 37302 Delivered on May 10, 2002" is the first decision that is based on Article 673 of Korean Civil Law. The first summary of this study is when a contract for work is terminated under Article 673 of the Civil Law, it is impossible for the person who ordered work to plead the reduction of the amount of compensation or liquidated damages on the basis of the contractor's fault or contributory negligence. The second summary of this study is when a contract for work is terminated under Article 673 of the Civil Law, the benefit accrued to the contractor as a result of the termination of the contract must be deducted in calculating the damages. When a contract for work is terminated pursuant to Article 673 of the Civil Law, the profits which the contractor has made by using his resources or efforts which became available due to the termination of the contract, or would thus have been able to make(but did not due to his or her laziness or neglect), or could make by utilizing the materials no longer needed due to the termination of the contract in some other uses or by selling them must necessarily be deducted from the amount of compensation. The relating arguments in Germany, Japan is introduced and studied for the comparison with Korean arguments.

발행기관:
법학연구원
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.17008/skklr.2007.19.3.028
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
일의 完成 前 都給人의 契約解除와 損害賠償 | 성균관법학 2007 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI