경쟁환경, 기술변화, 경쟁전략과 핵심인재관리 강도간의 관계에 대한 연구
An Investigation of Situational Leadership Theoryat the Group Level of Analysis
이경묵(서울대학교); 윤현중(서울대학교)
36권 5호, 1259~1294쪽
초록
본 논문에서는 기업간 핵심인재관리의 강도에 차이가 나는 원인을 기업이 처한 환경과 경쟁전략에서 찾아보고자 하였다. 환경 변수로 시장환경의 동태성, 노동시장의 세계화, 기술변화를 사용하였다. 가설로서 시장환경의 동태성이 높을수록, 노동시장의 세계화 정도가 높을수록, 기술변화의 정도가 높을수록 핵심인재관리의 강도가 높을 것이라는 것을 제시하였다. 또한 분석전략을 추구하는 기업보다 혁신전략을 추구하는 기업에서, 방어전략을 추구하는 기업보다 분석전략을 추구하는 기업에서 핵심인재관리를 위한 제도를 더 많이 사용할 것이라는 가설을 제시하였다. 이 가설을 검증하기 위해 2005 년 한국직업능력개발원이 수집한 인적자본 기업패널 1차년도 조사 자료 중에서 국내 대형 제조기업에 관한 자료를 사용하여 토빗 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과 시장환경의 동태성이 핵심인재관리 강도에 영향을 미칠 것이라는 가설을 제외한 가설들이 강하게 지지되었다. 다만 경쟁전략과 관련해서 분석전략을 추구하는 기업과 방어전략을 추구하는 기업간 핵심인재관리의 강도에 있어서는 유의한 차이를 발견하지 못하였다. 이러한 분석결과에 근거하여 본 연구의 이론적 함의와미래의 연구방향에 대해 논의하였다.
Abstract
Traditionally, large Korean companies have used standardized employment practices. Fresh college graduates have got almost identical compensation packages regardless of their major concentrations or competencies, if those graduates were hired by an employer. Employee competencies were rewarded by long-term promotion decision rather than by short-term pay increase. Asian financial crisis in 1997 and the globalization of large Korean firms caused changes in those practices. Large Korean companies began to treat top talents as special cases by providing special incentive, fringe benefits, specialized service to top talents. Some organizations heavily use diverse management tools that are specially designed for acquiring and maintaining top talents, while others do not. This paper investigates why we can observe the difference. This paper investigates the relationship between the critical influencing factors of firms and the use of top talents management tools based on the contingency approach, and highlights the effects of environmental dynamism, labor market, technological change, and competitive strategy in the use of human resource management tools for top talents. We hypothesize that firms facing rapidly changing market and changing technology are like to use a larger number of those tools. We also hypothesize that firms recruiting talents globally use a larger number of those tools than firms recruiting people domestically only. Additionally, we hypothesize that prospectors use a larger number of those tools than analyzers, and that analyzers use a larger number of those tools than defenders. To test the hypotheses, we analyzed data from 281 large Korean manufacturing firms. The data were collected by the Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training in 2005. Results from Tobit analysis support all hypotheses except the hypothesis on market changes. Firms facing fast technological changes, recruiting people globally, and pursuing strategies of prospectors utilize significantly larger number of management tools that are specially designed for acquiring and maintaining top talents. These results suggest that human resource management practices of organizations differ according to critical external environmental factors as well as competitive strategies of the organizations. This paper also reports how frequently large Korean firms use various management tools for acquiring and maintaining talents. Analysis of data from 454 large Korean firms shows that firms in banking and financial industries use those tools more intensively than those in manufacturing and non-financial service industries. The analysis also shows that Korean firms attempted to avoid severe deviation from traditional human resource management architecture in acquiring and maintaining top talents. After reporting the results, we discussed limitations of this paper and suggested directions of future research.
- 발행기관:
- 한국경영학회
- 분류:
- 경영학