애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문산업재산권2008.04 발행KCI 피인용 10

식약청 판매허가와 특허권의 연계를 위한 특허심판의 당사자 적격

Standing for Patent Trials Regrading KFDA Approval-Patent Linkage System

정차호(성균관대학교)

25호, 161~202쪽

초록

The Korea-US Free Trade Agreement having been agreed, Korea shall introduce the so-called Korean version of the U.S. Orange Book system. Under the system, patentee (brand drug company) will be notified of generic drug application. Then upon the patentee’s taking a required action, KFDA may automatically stay its approval procedure. It will be very complicated to soft-land and operate the system, due to related complex KFDA procedure, litigation procedure and patent trial procedure. This paper discusses some issues relevant to such procedures: efficiency of preliminary injunction system on this matter, patentee’s or generic drug applicant’s standing on a patent trial or a patent litigation. This paper has profound that (1) patentee may have standing on a preliminary injunction procedure, but injunction order may be little probable, (2) patentee may have standing on a (positive) patent scope confirmation trial, (3) generic drug applicant may have standing on a (negative) patent scope confirmation trial, and (4) generic drug applicant may have standing on a patent invalidation trial. However the Supreme Court has not resolved its self-conflicting positions on the standing issue of patent trials. If the approval-patent linkage system is being introduced, brand drug companies or generic drug companies may habitually request such trials. Without resolution of the Supreme Court’s self-conflicting positions, the brand new approval-patent linkage system will cause many troubles to users and relevant authorities. To smoothly operate the approval-patent linkage system, to enhance function of patent trial system, and to harmonize with U.S. and Japanese precedents, the Supreme Court should widen the door for such trials.

Abstract

The Korea-US Free Trade Agreement having been agreed, Korea shall introduce the so-called Korean version of the U.S. Orange Book system. Under the system, patentee (brand drug company) will be notified of generic drug application. Then upon the patentee’s taking a required action, KFDA may automatically stay its approval procedure. It will be very complicated to soft-land and operate the system, due to related complex KFDA procedure, litigation procedure and patent trial procedure. This paper discusses some issues relevant to such procedures: efficiency of preliminary injunction system on this matter, patentee’s or generic drug applicant’s standing on a patent trial or a patent litigation. This paper has profound that (1) patentee may have standing on a preliminary injunction procedure, but injunction order may be little probable, (2) patentee may have standing on a (positive) patent scope confirmation trial, (3) generic drug applicant may have standing on a (negative) patent scope confirmation trial, and (4) generic drug applicant may have standing on a patent invalidation trial. However the Supreme Court has not resolved its self-conflicting positions on the standing issue of patent trials. If the approval-patent linkage system is being introduced, brand drug companies or generic drug companies may habitually request such trials. Without resolution of the Supreme Court’s self-conflicting positions, the brand new approval-patent linkage system will cause many troubles to users and relevant authorities. To smoothly operate the approval-patent linkage system, to enhance function of patent trial system, and to harmonize with U.S. and Japanese precedents, the Supreme Court should widen the door for such trials.

발행기관:
한국지식재산학회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
식약청 판매허가와 특허권의 연계를 위한 특허심판의 당사자 적격 | 산업재산권 2008 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI