소청심사제도에 관한 비교법적 고찰 - 한국, 일본, 중국 및 싱가포르를 중심으로 -

This study of “Legal Comparative Analysis about Appeals of Public Officials” aims at finding out Appeals of Public Officials in Korea and foreign countries (Japan, China and Singapore) by grafting various sides about appeals of public servants onto the realistic, dynamic power inherent to Appeals of Public Officials. This study is intended to contribute to the study of comparative Appeals of Public Officials in Korea and foreign countries by digging appeals made by employees who were accused of failure in performing their duties properly. A public servant of government (Employees of Korea and foreign countries) has right and duty in performing his official affairs and in leading a life as a public servant, but his responsibility upon his shoulders is enormous. In case a government servant is under a disciplinary punishment or at a disadvantage against his will, he has chance to redress a wrong by appealing to the fact-finding committee before he makes an appeal to the (administrative) court. This study classifies the patterns of appeals made by Employees of Korea and foreign countries(public servants of governments) and examines the decision patterns made by the fact-finding committee of Korea to contribute to the study of Korea and foreign countries’ traits in relation to appeals by investigating the contents of legal redress.