정보매체의 규제조직에 관한 법적 연구

As advent of information environment shift shapes up with the progress of IT(Information Technology) accompanied by digital convergence and ubiquitous computing, nowadays it is essential systematically to cope with state functions related to electronic information including public administration. Therefore should the political settlement and positive enforcement of social fluctuation be a criteria and traction for establishing 「Informationsordnung(information order)」 on account of paradigm shift in governmental structure to governance system suitable for accomplishing informational affairs of public administration, because what contains the core value by actualizing national purpose and constituting legal relationship is nothing but information in 「Informationsgesellschaft(information society)」. On that ground, this study investigates 「Informationsverwaltung(public administration of information)」 focused upon regulatory organization of information media in favor of inquiring into the fundamental truth maintaining principle of administrative law. Such is the viewpoint from 「Informationsverwaltungsrecht(administrative law dealing with issues of public administration related to information)」. To deal with this theme, this study analyzes typical pattern holding issues of copying with digital convergence from unitive viewpoint of legal thesis on operation and organization in public administration. Consequently, this treatise reaches conclusion that regulatory organization of converging broadcast with telecommunication should be directed to an administrative commission belonging to a president with relevant independence to function and authority of media regulation. Synthetically speaking, it stands to reason that the regulatory jurisprudence of information media abide by the rules setting the goal at 「erhebliche Rechtsmäßigkeit der Verwaltung(substantial constitutionalism embodied by the ‘rule of law’ on administration)」 for the sake of public interest. From this angle of vision, these rules would penetrate Informationsverwaltungsrecht with no proof corroborative more than of media regulation.