적대적 M&A와 그 방어책에 관한 연구 — 주식관련 포이즌 필의 도입과 관련하여 —
A Study on the Defenses against Hostile Takeover
정규(공주대학교)
8권 1호, 213~230쪽
초록
Among the takeover defenses that have been developed over the past thirty years, the poison pill is by far the most important defense today. In Korea, it was permitted, many corporations used to hostile takeover in the year 1990's. And after the year 2000's, increase it. But the defenses are forbid. The problems of the hostile takeover is revealed on the corporate raider speculate on gambling, specially foreigners attack in waves. So economic organization as the Korean Chamer of Commerce and Industry and the Federation of Korean Industries has been demanded to legislate on the defenses against hostile takeover. The outstanding legal problem on the defenses against hostile takeover are permission of the defenses and agreement of interests between attacker and defender. A view in the affirmative insist on the target corporation of the manager as officer and director can defense against hostile takeover based on. business judgement. On the contrary, a opinion in the negative persist in object. I think that the defenses against hostile takeover have to permit with discretion, on condition that manager's act with fiduciary duty and business judgement rule. But it have to prohibit, is of private business for his own interest like a protecting for his corporate control right.
Abstract
Among the takeover defenses that have been developed over the past thirty years, the poison pill is by far the most important defense today. In Korea, it was permitted, many corporations used to hostile takeover in the year 1990's. And after the year 2000's, increase it. But the defenses are forbid. The problems of the hostile takeover is revealed on the corporate raider speculate on gambling, specially foreigners attack in waves. So economic organization as the Korean Chamer of Commerce and Industry and the Federation of Korean Industries has been demanded to legislate on the defenses against hostile takeover. The outstanding legal problem on the defenses against hostile takeover are permission of the defenses and agreement of interests between attacker and defender. A view in the affirmative insist on the target corporation of the manager as officer and director can defense against hostile takeover based on. business judgement. On the contrary, a opinion in the negative persist in object. I think that the defenses against hostile takeover have to permit with discretion, on condition that manager's act with fiduciary duty and business judgement rule. But it have to prohibit, is of private business for his own interest like a protecting for his corporate control right.
- 발행기관:
- 한국법정책학회
- 분류:
- 법학