애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문한양법학2008.06 발행KCI 피인용 3

근로시간 및 휴게시간 특례규정의 개선방안

Legal Research on the Improvement of Special Provisions as to Work and Recess Hours

최영진(경상대학교)

23호, 507~530쪽

초록

The purpose of regulating work and recess hours is for the labor's healthy and security problem and for ensuring the carefree leasure time and for the labor's refreshment and for the improving the working capabilities. However, in some cases, these regulations of work and recess hours will make it difficult to applicate the rule properly, because of its speciality. About this condition, Korea Labor Standards Act §59 now regulates the special provisions as to work and recess hours. But there are also some criticism that the special provisions as to work and recess hours is against the korea labor's rule and the criterion of ILO. Therefore, it is asked for reforming the Korea Labor Standards Act §59. According to these facts, this research had examined the Japanese special provisions as to work and recess hours as like Korea Labor Standards Act §59 and suggested its point of view. Implications are as follow: First, it should be regulated the coverage special provisions. Second, as appling the rule, the strict limitation against extending the working time should be set. Third, it should be embodied the meaning of "Labor Representative". Fourth, it will introduce the criterion of simultaneous endowment as to recess hours. Last, in the cases of overtime exceeding 8 hours, the endowment its criterion should be written down.

Abstract

The purpose of regulating work and recess hours is for the labor's healthy and security problem and for ensuring the carefree leasure time and for the labor's refreshment and for the improving the working capabilities. However, in some cases, these regulations of work and recess hours will make it difficult to applicate the rule properly, because of its speciality. About this condition, Korea Labor Standards Act §59 now regulates the special provisions as to work and recess hours. But there are also some criticism that the special provisions as to work and recess hours is against the korea labor's rule and the criterion of ILO. Therefore, it is asked for reforming the Korea Labor Standards Act §59. According to these facts, this research had examined the Japanese special provisions as to work and recess hours as like Korea Labor Standards Act §59 and suggested its point of view. Implications are as follow: First, it should be regulated the coverage special provisions. Second, as appling the rule, the strict limitation against extending the working time should be set. Third, it should be embodied the meaning of "Labor Representative". Fourth, it will introduce the criterion of simultaneous endowment as to recess hours. Last, in the cases of overtime exceeding 8 hours, the endowment its criterion should be written down.

발행기관:
한양법학회
분류:
법해석학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
근로시간 및 휴게시간 특례규정의 개선방안 | 한양법학 2008 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI