애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문가족법연구2007.07 발행KCI 피인용 2

改名許可의 要件 ―대법원 2005. 11. 16.자 2005스26 결정(公 2006상, 35)―

The requirements for the change of given name

윤진수(서울대학교)

21권 2호, 85~120쪽

초록

The decision of the Korean Supreme Court on November 16, 2005 declared that the change of given name should be granted if there is an adequate reason and it is not an abuse of right. This decision was welcomed by many because it has expanded the freedom to change the given name. But it is not clear why there should be an adequate reason for change of given name. This article surveys the discussions on this problem in Korea, makes a comparative analysis, and concludes that the requirement of adequate reason is unnecessary because of the following reasons. First, the Korean statutory law prescribes no such requirement. Second, in view of the fact that the freedom to change one’s given name belongs to the human right guaranteed by Constitution, there should be a compelling reason to restrict such freedom. Consequently, the petition to change one’s given name should be always granted unless there is a special circumstances that make the petition an abuse of the right. It seems that after this decision the Korean courts require no adequate reason also practically.

Abstract

The decision of the Korean Supreme Court on November 16, 2005 declared that the change of given name should be granted if there is an adequate reason and it is not an abuse of right. This decision was welcomed by many because it has expanded the freedom to change the given name. But it is not clear why there should be an adequate reason for change of given name. This article surveys the discussions on this problem in Korea, makes a comparative analysis, and concludes that the requirement of adequate reason is unnecessary because of the following reasons. First, the Korean statutory law prescribes no such requirement. Second, in view of the fact that the freedom to change one’s given name belongs to the human right guaranteed by Constitution, there should be a compelling reason to restrict such freedom. Consequently, the petition to change one’s given name should be always granted unless there is a special circumstances that make the petition an abuse of the right. It seems that after this decision the Korean courts require no adequate reason also practically.

발행기관:
한국가족법학회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
改名許可의 要件 ―대법원 2005. 11. 16.자 2005스26 결정(公 2006상, 35)― | 가족법연구 2007 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI