애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문상사판례연구2008.09 발행KCI 피인용 3

공정거래법상 과징금의 법적 문제

A Legal Problems of Surcharge on the Unfair Trade Act

전삼현(숭실대학교)

21권 3호, 203~225쪽

초록

The South Korea and Japan are the unique country to controll the company with surcharge system. Japan made the surcharge system in 1977 for the first in the world, and our country imported it in 1980. But Korea and Japan have had some difficulty with the legal character of surcharge since the legislation of it. Nowadays, the theory of unfair profit redemption is usually agreed in Japan. That means that Japan could manage the problems of the double and excessive regulation with the denial on the surcharge's legal character of penalty. Namely, the subject of surcharge is the natural busuness man in case of personal illegal behaviors, and the legal person in case of illegal behaviors of companies. And the subjective behaviors of imposed surcharge are restricted in some cases that limit the consideration of service or actually the suppling quantities of articles of commerce. That means that the personal monopoly or unfair trade method are not the subjects of surcharge. In Germany, only the fines for default are imposed to the person having the illegal behaviors by Art.38 German Anti-Trust Act(Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen: GWB). To compare with Japan, the surcharge systems of Korean Fair Trade Act is used to get the punitive effects besides the unfair profit redemption. In order to resolusion of these problems, we need to improve the surcharge system of the Fair Trade Act.

Abstract

The South Korea and Japan are the unique country to controll the company with surcharge system. Japan made the surcharge system in 1977 for the first in the world, and our country imported it in 1980. But Korea and Japan have had some difficulty with the legal character of surcharge since the legislation of it. Nowadays, the theory of unfair profit redemption is usually agreed in Japan. That means that Japan could manage the problems of the double and excessive regulation with the denial on the surcharge's legal character of penalty. Namely, the subject of surcharge is the natural busuness man in case of personal illegal behaviors, and the legal person in case of illegal behaviors of companies. And the subjective behaviors of imposed surcharge are restricted in some cases that limit the consideration of service or actually the suppling quantities of articles of commerce. That means that the personal monopoly or unfair trade method are not the subjects of surcharge. In Germany, only the fines for default are imposed to the person having the illegal behaviors by Art.38 German Anti-Trust Act(Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen: GWB). To compare with Japan, the surcharge systems of Korean Fair Trade Act is used to get the punitive effects besides the unfair profit redemption. In order to resolusion of these problems, we need to improve the surcharge system of the Fair Trade Act.

발행기관:
한국상사판례학회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
공정거래법상 과징금의 법적 문제 | 상사판례연구 2008 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI