애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문중앙법학2008.10 발행KCI 피인용 1

ADR의 선택에 관한 연구 - 무역클레임을 중심으로 -

A Study on the Selection of ADR - Focused on International Trade Claim -

이동률(건국대학교); 이기희((사)한국관세협회)

10권 3호, 37~63쪽

초록

To solve trade claims, this research reviewed the essence and characteristics of ADR which companies utilize domestically, and by analyzing the utilization conditions, proposed the following plan for effective utilization of ADR in case trade claim breaks out. First, the disputed party shall select ADR type suitable for themselves by making overall considerations such as the financial condition of their own company, necessity of confidentiality and urgency of dispute resolution etc after reviewing sustained necessity of business relation with the other party. Second, if dispute amount is small, mediation is more useful than arbitration. Third, if control right on trade claim solution procedure and results is desired, mediation is useful, and if trade claim solution procedure and results wish to be committed to third party, arbitration is useful. Fourth, mediation is useful for cases where dispute parties desire to solve dispute on the basis of business interest relations rather than strict legal responsibility and obligation. Finally, to persuade the concerned party directly, select mediation, and if persuasion of third party is determined more beneficial to you, select arbitration.

Abstract

To solve trade claims, this research reviewed the essence and characteristics of ADR which companies utilize domestically, and by analyzing the utilization conditions, proposed the following plan for effective utilization of ADR in case trade claim breaks out. First, the disputed party shall select ADR type suitable for themselves by making overall considerations such as the financial condition of their own company, necessity of confidentiality and urgency of dispute resolution etc after reviewing sustained necessity of business relation with the other party. Second, if dispute amount is small, mediation is more useful than arbitration. Third, if control right on trade claim solution procedure and results is desired, mediation is useful, and if trade claim solution procedure and results wish to be committed to third party, arbitration is useful. Fourth, mediation is useful for cases where dispute parties desire to solve dispute on the basis of business interest relations rather than strict legal responsibility and obligation. Finally, to persuade the concerned party directly, select mediation, and if persuasion of third party is determined more beneficial to you, select arbitration.

발행기관:
중앙법학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.21759/caulaw.2008.10.3.37
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
ADR의 선택에 관한 연구 - 무역클레임을 중심으로 - | 중앙법학 2008 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI