파산관재인이 통정허위표시의 제3자에 해당하는지의 여부와 선의·악의의 판단기준 － 대법원 2006.11.10.선고 2004다10299 판결 -

The case for study finds that a trustee in bankruptcy constitutes a third party in a false representation. This case also finds that a good faith or bad faith should be determined based on not a trustee in bankruptcy but creditors in bankruptcy. However, it does not seem valid. In order for a trustee in bankruptcy to fall under the meaning of a third party, there should exist circumstances where a trustee in bankruptcy has entered into a relationship in interest under the new laws based on a false representation. However, in the case for study, this circumstance fails to exist. Although it is true that the trustee in bankruptcy falls under the meaning of a third party, it appears valid that the good faith or bad faith will should be determined based on not creditors in bankruptcy but a trustee in bankruptcy.