우리나라 임원보상 공시제도의 문제점 및 개선방안에 관한 연구: 한ㆍ미 비교분석을 중심으로
Research on Problems and Improvement Methods for Executive Compensation Disclosure : Comparison Analysis of Rules and Practices in Korea and the United States
송기신(백석대학교); 송학준(Temple University)
13권 3호, 355~395쪽
초록
본 연구에서는 우리나라와 미국의 임원보상에 대한 공시제도 및 공시실태를 비교ㆍ분석함으로써 우리나라 임원보상 공시의 문제점과 개선방안을 제시하였다. 공시제도의 비교ㆍ분석을 함에 있어서는 임원보상에 관한 양국의 법률적인 내용과 모범규준을 활용하였으며, 공시실태의 경우에는 임원보상 관련 공시가 우수하다고 평가되는 기업들을 3개씩 선정하여 분석하였다. 이 결과 우리나라 임원보상에 대한 공시제도의 문제점은 다음과 같이 요약될 수 있다. 첫째, 임원 보상에 대한 철학, 원칙, 보상과정 및 각 보상수단별 보상방침이 공시되지 않고 있다. 둘째, 공시대상 임원의 범위가 정보이용자들의 요구와 부합하지 않을 수도 있다. 셋째, 기업별로 임원보상의 구체적 수단에 대해 공시하는 형태가 달라서 기업간 비교가능성이 감소되고 있으며, 다양한 보상수단을 혼합하여 사용하는 것에 대해서는 공시하고 있지 않다. 넷째, 주식매수선택권에 대해서는 현재 비등기임원까지 개인별로 부여현황을 공시하도록 되어 있는 반면, 현금 보상에 대해서는 상임이사 및 사외이사들의 총액 및 1인당 평균 보상액만 공시하도록 되어 있어서 공시의 일관성이 없고, 임원 개인별로 보상액을 정확하게 파악할 수 없다. 다섯째, ‘주식매수청구권 부여 및 행사표’에는 과거 부여분, 당기 부여분 및 당기 행사분이 혼합하여 제시되고 있어서 투자가들에게 혼동을 일으킬 수 있다. 여섯째, 우리나라의 현행 기업회계기준에서는 임원보상 관련 정보를 주석으로 공시하도록 하고 있으나, 이에 대한 구체적인 실무지침사례를 제시하지 않고 있기 때문에 주석 공시의 기업간, 기간간 비교가능성을 저해할 수 있다.
Abstract
This research presents problems and improvement methods of disclosure rules and practices for executive compensation by comparing and analyzing the practices in Korea and the United States. In terms of laws, regulations and standard recommendations concerning the disclosure of executive compensation, both countries have been compared and analyzed. Three exemplary firms from both countries have been selected for comparison and analysis. Problems concerning the executive compensation disclosure rules in Korea can be summarized as follows. First of all, philosophy, principles, process of executive compensation and policies for each compensation component are not disclosed adequately. Second, the coverage of executives for disclosure may not fit the needs of information users. Third, the disclosure formats for various compensation components differ from firm to firm making it difficult to compare each other between firms. The weight and mixture of compensation components are not properly disclosed. Fourth, even non-registered executives are required to disclose stock option rewards by individual. However, in the case of cash compensation, only total amount and average amount per person are required to be disclosed for executives and outside directors. The disclosure methods of compensation components are inconsistent making it hard to show the amount of compensation for each executive. Fifth, previous awards, current awards and current exercises of stock option are provided in one table, which can be confusing to the investors. Sixth, Korean GAAP requires firms to provide executive compensation information as footnotes, but it does not provide detailed disclosure guidelines. Therefore, the comparability among firms and time periods might suffer. The improvement methods for those problems are as follows. First of all, philosophy, principles, business performance target, and performance evaluation process for executive compensation and compensation policy for each compensation component such as cash, bonus, stock and stock option should be disclosed in detail. In order to accomplish this goal, the compensation committee composed of independent outside directors must be established within the board of directors. Non-affiliated compensation consultants should also be hired. Second, the coverage of executives for disclosure should be extended to more than 5 highest paid positions including the CEO in order to meet the needs of the information users adequately. Third, in the event that various compensation components are combined, the nature of such composition must be disclosed. A variety of perks such as golf, health club membership, tax gross-up and severance pay must also be included in the disclosure coverage of executive compensation. Fourth, individual executive compensation should be disclosed in order that stockholders will be able to judge whether executive compensation is linked to business performance and whether decisions of the executives are made in such a way that improves long-term shareholder value. Fifth, separate table for previous awards of stock option and realized gain from exercise of stock option needs to be provided. Current awards of stock option need to be provided along with cash compensation, so that investors can understand the current compensation of executives clearly. Sixth, detailed disclosure guidelines for Korean GAAP footnotes of executive compensation need to be made. In order to increase the possibility of comparison between companies and time periods, certain revisions concerning the practical implications need to be made. In the implications section, such elements as the definition of the term "major management", categories of compensation, standard forms and details by category should be included as guidelines. Lastly, firms need to make voluntary disclosure efforts rather than meeting minimal disclosure requirements by the securities law. The results of this research are expected to be used as a significant input in the development of policies regarding the executive compensation disclosure by regulatory authorities and institutes of accounting standards.
- 발행기관:
- 한국회계정책학회
- 분류:
- 회계학