경쟁법의 입법주의 구분에 관한 소고 공정거래법은 과연 폐해규제주의 입법인가?
A Study on the Legislative Principles of Competition Law: Does the Korean Antimonopoly Law take the abuse principle?
이문지(배재대학교)
21권 4호, 311~330쪽
초록
The Competition laws of the developed countries have been generally classified by whether they adopt the prohibition principle or the abuse principle. The former takes the view of denying monopoly or monopolization itself and regards restraints of trade per se illegal. The latter takes the view that monopoly shall be controlled only if it infringed on the public interest and produces harmful effects. This classification stems from the history of legislation or the severity of law enforcement. But it is difficult to place the competition law of a specific country into one category or the other under such a classification. Therefore it would not be proper to say that the Korean antimonopoly law take either one of the above two principles.
Abstract
The Competition laws of the developed countries have been generally classified by whether they adopt the prohibition principle or the abuse principle. The former takes the view of denying monopoly or monopolization itself and regards restraints of trade per se illegal. The latter takes the view that monopoly shall be controlled only if it infringed on the public interest and produces harmful effects. This classification stems from the history of legislation or the severity of law enforcement. But it is difficult to place the competition law of a specific country into one category or the other under such a classification. Therefore it would not be proper to say that the Korean antimonopoly law take either one of the above two principles.
- 발행기관:
- 한국상사판례학회
- 분류:
- 법학