애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문법학연구2008.06 발행KCI 피인용 4

자구행위에 관한 판례의 동향과 입법론

The Trends of Korean Supreme Court Legal Policy on Korean Criminal Code §23

윤종행(충남대학교)

19권 1호, 147~160쪽

초록

According to Korean Criminal Code §23, the commission of a proscribed act such as entry of dwelling, arrest, use of force, etc. can be justified to protect personal right of property against unlawful interference. To be justifiable, it is necessary to fulfill the required conditions of urgent circumstances and approvable behaviors following the common rule of Korean society. Some scholars argue that this code is not good way to regulate such affairs because it's justification conditions are so strict that the ruled scope is too narrow. According to these opinions, it is necessary to abolish this code for the enlargement of the justifiable extents. However, this code would be helpful to protect personal rights and contribute to people's belief toward judicial procedure. Furthermore, under certain circumstances, some behaviors could be justifiable as affirmative self-defense or Korean Criminal Code §20. Therefore, this code would not make the protection range of common people's rights narrow. It would be desirable for Korean Supreme Court to use more detailed yardsticks on interpretation of this code §23.

Abstract

According to Korean Criminal Code §23, the commission of a proscribed act such as entry of dwelling, arrest, use of force, etc. can be justified to protect personal right of property against unlawful interference. To be justifiable, it is necessary to fulfill the required conditions of urgent circumstances and approvable behaviors following the common rule of Korean society. Some scholars argue that this code is not good way to regulate such affairs because it's justification conditions are so strict that the ruled scope is too narrow. According to these opinions, it is necessary to abolish this code for the enlargement of the justifiable extents. However, this code would be helpful to protect personal rights and contribute to people's belief toward judicial procedure. Furthermore, under certain circumstances, some behaviors could be justifiable as affirmative self-defense or Korean Criminal Code §20. Therefore, this code would not make the protection range of common people's rights narrow. It would be desirable for Korean Supreme Court to use more detailed yardsticks on interpretation of this code §23.

발행기관:
법학연구소
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
자구행위에 관한 판례의 동향과 입법론 | 법학연구 2008 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI