애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문법학연구2004.06 발행

New Law for the E-Commerce Age* Case Analysis on Internet BusinessMethod Patents in the USA

New Law for the E-Commerce Age* Case Analysis on Internet BusinessMethod Patents in the USA

조성자

14권 2호, 157~187쪽

초록

Under Section 101 (between partentable) of the US Patent Act, the courts created two judicially0created exceptions to patentable subject matters: mathematical algorithm and business method. However, Stat Street Bank & Trust Co. V. Singnature Financial Group, Inc. rendered by the Court of Appeals of the Fderal Circuit in 1998 recognized patentability of business method inventions. Nevertheless, many Internet business method patents newly issued after State Street Bak have been criticized for patentability problems such as abstract ideas or method without particular means or useunder Section 101, lack of novelty under Section 102, and obviousness under Section 103. To prevent these criticism from becoming grounds to deny business methodpatents as a whole, the Congress and the courts need to provide more clear guidelines to examine the business method patent applications, and the USPTO should be equiped with its organizational ability enough to scructinize patentability of the applications under the present Patent Act.

Abstract

Under Section 101 (between partentable) of the US Patent Act, the courts created two judicially0created exceptions to patentable subject matters: mathematical algorithm and business method. However, Stat Street Bank & Trust Co. V. Singnature Financial Group, Inc. rendered by the Court of Appeals of the Fderal Circuit in 1998 recognized patentability of business method inventions. Nevertheless, many Internet business method patents newly issued after State Street Bak have been criticized for patentability problems such as abstract ideas or method without particular means or useunder Section 101, lack of novelty under Section 102, and obviousness under Section 103. To prevent these criticism from becoming grounds to deny business methodpatents as a whole, the Congress and the courts need to provide more clear guidelines to examine the business method patent applications, and the USPTO should be equiped with its organizational ability enough to scructinize patentability of the applications under the present Patent Act.

발행기관:
법학연구원
분류:
기타법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
New Law for the E-Commerce Age* Case Analysis on Internet BusinessMethod Patents in the USA | 법학연구 2004 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI