中国刑法中的交通肇事罪若干问题研究 (중국 형법상의 교통사고죄에 관한 연구)
Study on Several Issues of Traffic Offense in China's Criminal Law
혁흥왕(중국인민대학교)
29호, 237~273쪽
초록
中国刑法在危害公共安全犯罪一章中规定了交通肇事罪，本文立足于中国刑法的立 法和司法解释，从理论与实践的结合上对中国刑法中的交通肇事罪作了全面深入的 研究。论文根据中国关于交通肇事罪的司法实践，以中国刑法理论中犯罪构成为框 架，剖析了交通肇事罪的构成要素，并在如下方面进行了开创性的研究：（1）根据 行为主体的条件，提出了刑事责任转移的理论，对中国刑法立法及司法解释中的错 误提出了批判；（2）基于中国刑法中交通肇事罪的行为人在主观方面只能是过失的 理论，对理论界提出的混合罪过、共同过失等学说进行了分析批判；（3）对交通肇 事罪与其他故意犯罪如何进行区分进行了深刻的探讨，特别是对间接故意与过于自 信的过失的研究，认为行为人的主观内容是经常变化的，决不能把凡是驾车导致事 故的均认定为交通肇事罪，而应当根据实际情况判断行为人主观内容是不是存在故 意（主要是间接故意），如果能够判断出行为人主观上具有故意，就不能以交通肇 事罪论处，这为中国司法机关近年来对发生的交通事故行为按照故意犯罪定罪处罚 提供了有力的理论支持；（4）基于允许的危险理论和信赖规则，本文对中国刑法中 的交通肇事罪的刑事责任问题进行了研究，分析了中国交通文化的缺失与责任划分 的原则标准，提出中国刑法在此方面立法的缺陷。（5）基于中国刑法立法的不足， 论文提出在中国刑法中设立交通肇事危险犯的构想。
Abstract
The chapter of endangering public safety in China's Criminal Law provides traffic Offense. This article is based on China's legislative and judicial interpretation, giving a comprehensive and in-depth study on the crime in combination of theory and practice. Basing on the judicial practice of traffic offence , within the framework of crime constitution in criminal theory of China, the paper probes into constituent elements of the crime and researches creatively in the following aspects: (1) According to the conditions of perpetrator, the author provides the transfer of criminal liability thoery and criticizes the errors in China's legislative and judicial interpretation; (2) In respect to the traditional thoery that the subjective aspect of traffic Offense should only be negligence, the author analyzes and criticizes some new ideas,such as mixed negligence and contributory negligence; (3) The paper explores profoundly into the distinction between traffic Offense and other intentional crimes, especially into indirect intentional fault and over-confident negligence, holding that the perpetrator's subjective content is constantly changing, and should not construe that any drive leading to accidents be identified into traffic offence, but should be judged according to the actual conditions of the perpetrator whether there is subjective intent (mainly indirect intent), if we can determine that the perpetrator has subjective intent, it should not be punished as traffic Offense, which privides theoretical support for China’s judicial practice in recent years; (4) Basing on the theory of permitting danger and trust rules, the paper probes into the criminal liability of traffic Offense in China's Criminal Law, analyzes the absence of traffic culture and the principle criteria of responsibility division, and puts forward the deficiencies in China's Criminal Law legislation. (5) basing on the deficiency of China's Criminal Law legislation, the paper proposes the establishment of a traffic offence endangerance in China's criminal law.
- 발행기관:
- 법학연구소
- 분류:
- 법학일반