애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문중앙법학2010.03 발행KCI 피인용 20

헌법불합치결정에 따른 입법개선의무의 이행현황 분석과 비판

A analysis of legal amendment by a decision of constitutional nonconformity

이인호(중앙대학교); 오수정(중앙대학교)

12권 1호, 45~84쪽

초록

A decision of constitutional nonconformity is a kind of unconstitutional decision that the Constitutional Court rules. This decision is called "Unvereinbarerklälung" in Germany. This decision means the Constitutional Court acknowledges a law's unconstitutionality but merely requests the National Assembly to revise it by a certain period while having the law remain effective until that time. As mentioned above, this decision requests the National Assembly to revise it by a certain period. So legal amendment is very important in order that this decision keeps its effectiveness. But the type of decision of constitutional nonconformity is various - by application of the provision and establishment of the legal deadline. A decision of nonconformity devides into prohibiting a provision of constitutional nonconformity and applicating the provision. So a analysis of legal amendment by a decision of constitutional nonconformity depends on the type of decision of constitutional nonconformity. In order to survey whether legal amendment reflect a decision of Constitutional Court, this analysis considers whether the legal amendment follows the established legal deadline, reflects the decision of Constitutional Court and prescribes a retroactive provision.

Abstract

A decision of constitutional nonconformity is a kind of unconstitutional decision that the Constitutional Court rules. This decision is called "Unvereinbarerklälung" in Germany. This decision means the Constitutional Court acknowledges a law's unconstitutionality but merely requests the National Assembly to revise it by a certain period while having the law remain effective until that time. As mentioned above, this decision requests the National Assembly to revise it by a certain period. So legal amendment is very important in order that this decision keeps its effectiveness. But the type of decision of constitutional nonconformity is various - by application of the provision and establishment of the legal deadline. A decision of nonconformity devides into prohibiting a provision of constitutional nonconformity and applicating the provision. So a analysis of legal amendment by a decision of constitutional nonconformity depends on the type of decision of constitutional nonconformity. In order to survey whether legal amendment reflect a decision of Constitutional Court, this analysis considers whether the legal amendment follows the established legal deadline, reflects the decision of Constitutional Court and prescribes a retroactive provision.

발행기관:
중앙법학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.21759/caulaw.2010.12.1.45
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
헌법불합치결정에 따른 입법개선의무의 이행현황 분석과 비판 | 중앙법학 2010 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI