애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문법학연구2010.04 발행KCI 피인용 4

식별력의 본질에 관한 법적해석의 비교법적 고찰 - 일본에서의 판례해석을 중심으로-

A Comparative Study on Legal Interpretation of the Essence of Distinctive Character-Focusing on interpretation of the judicial precedents in Japan-

정태호(특허청)

21권 1호, 253~278쪽

초록

This article relates to Legal Interpretation of the Essence of Distinctive Character. In most countries' instances, some grounds for refusal such as lack of distinctiveness and descriptiveness overlap(simultaneously applicable) but even in this case the grounds may not be mixed but must be given a separate reasoning. In particular, in the case of word marks having a semantic meaning, the examination shall start with descriptiveness, and in a separate paragraph lack of distinctiveness should be addressed, clearly mentioning whether the lack of distinctiveness arises out of the same, or different, considerations, than those which lead to considering the mark descriptive. But, on determining whether a mark is not distinctive or descriptive, a character distinguishing the origin of the product from those of other traders and needs of free use should be considered together and distinguished. By doing so, we can determine correctly whether a mark is not distinctive or descriptive.

Abstract

This article relates to Legal Interpretation of the Essence of Distinctive Character. In most countries' instances, some grounds for refusal such as lack of distinctiveness and descriptiveness overlap(simultaneously applicable) but even in this case the grounds may not be mixed but must be given a separate reasoning. In particular, in the case of word marks having a semantic meaning, the examination shall start with descriptiveness, and in a separate paragraph lack of distinctiveness should be addressed, clearly mentioning whether the lack of distinctiveness arises out of the same, or different, considerations, than those which lead to considering the mark descriptive. But, on determining whether a mark is not distinctive or descriptive, a character distinguishing the origin of the product from those of other traders and needs of free use should be considered together and distinguished. By doing so, we can determine correctly whether a mark is not distinctive or descriptive.

발행기관:
법학연구소
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
식별력의 본질에 관한 법적해석의 비교법적 고찰 - 일본에서의 판례해석을 중심으로- | 법학연구 2010 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI