애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문기업법연구2010.06 발행KCI 피인용 2

다른 자동차운전담보 특별약관의 보상책임조항과 양도조항에 관한 연구

A Study on the Insuring Agreement Clause and Assignment Clause of「The Driving Others Automobile Special Clause

양해일(전남대학교)

24권 2호, 261~283쪽

초록

In the「Uninsured Motorist Coverage」, the accident due to ‘the other automobile’ is also covered by「The Driving Others Automobile Special Clause」. However, in order for the insurer to take responsibility of compensation, ‘driving the other automobile’ and ‘not parking or stopping’ besides liability for accident compensation and injuries of the insured is required, and as ‘personal damageⅠis excluded’ the coverage is possible only if the requirements are applied. However, considering the introduction intention of these special terms, it can be problematic because these special terms are to promote the convenience of the insured and help the victim of car accidents at the same time. In addition, ‘the other automobile’ that the insured is driving is not the covered vehicle originally, but the special terms aim to protect it identically with the case of liability caused by the covered vehicle. On the other hand, in case of the covered vehicle assignment, the force of the special terms is different from a proviso unlike the assignment clause. It accepts the effect of a lapsed insurance contract, which means that it violates the insurance law largely. Therefore, this study is conducted to look into those problems and the improvement methods.

Abstract

In the「Uninsured Motorist Coverage」, the accident due to ‘the other automobile’ is also covered by「The Driving Others Automobile Special Clause」. However, in order for the insurer to take responsibility of compensation, ‘driving the other automobile’ and ‘not parking or stopping’ besides liability for accident compensation and injuries of the insured is required, and as ‘personal damageⅠis excluded’ the coverage is possible only if the requirements are applied. However, considering the introduction intention of these special terms, it can be problematic because these special terms are to promote the convenience of the insured and help the victim of car accidents at the same time. In addition, ‘the other automobile’ that the insured is driving is not the covered vehicle originally, but the special terms aim to protect it identically with the case of liability caused by the covered vehicle. On the other hand, in case of the covered vehicle assignment, the force of the special terms is different from a proviso unlike the assignment clause. It accepts the effect of a lapsed insurance contract, which means that it violates the insurance law largely. Therefore, this study is conducted to look into those problems and the improvement methods.

발행기관:
한국기업법학회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
다른 자동차운전담보 특별약관의 보상책임조항과 양도조항에 관한 연구 | 기업법연구 2010 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI