애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문과학기술법연구2010.06 발행KCI 피인용 2

특허권의 침해금지명령(Injunction)과 관련된 한-EU FTA의 내용 및 그 이행방안

Contents and Acceptance Method of Korea-EU FTA regarding Injunction

윤기승(한남대학교)

16권 1호, 99~135쪽

초록

Korea and EU temporally signed Free Trade Agreement(FTA) at Brussels on the 15th of October, 2009. This Korea-EU FTA includes national treatment and market access for goods, trade remedies,technical barriers to trade, sanitary and phytosanitary measures,customs and trade facilitation, trade in services, establishment and electronic commerce, etc. In the field of intellectual property of Korea-EU FTA there are regulations embodying copyright, the rights related to patents, trademarks, service marks, designs, etc. Especially among such regulations there are those related to injunction, which are Injunction(10.48) and Alternative Measure(10.49). These regulations go hand in glove with Patent Troll that makes much money only through infringement lawsuits or transfers and licenses of patent rights without manufacturing goods. That is,Patent Troll is only patent owner but has no intention to manufacture goods. In this case, we come to grips with big problem whether Patent Troll should be protected by the Patent Act or infringer should be protected by the public interest. Of course, according to Korea-EU FTA, it is Korea's decision whether Korea would provide that at the request of the person liable to be subject to the measures of injunction, the competent judicial authorities may order pecuniary compensation to be paid to the injured party instead of applying the measures of injunction. However, in the case of ordering pecuniary compensation as alternative measures, Korea-EU FTA requests that infringer acted unintentionally and without negligence, execution of the measures in question would cause him or her disproportionate harm and pecuniary compensation to the injured party appears reasonably satisfactory. So this study aims for examining carefully contents of Korea-EU FTA regarding regulation of injunction and alternative measures,deciding whether we would accept such regulations in Korea-EU FTA and suggesting proposal to amend the Patent Act in case of accepting such regulations.

Abstract

Korea and EU temporally signed Free Trade Agreement(FTA) at Brussels on the 15th of October, 2009. This Korea-EU FTA includes national treatment and market access for goods, trade remedies,technical barriers to trade, sanitary and phytosanitary measures,customs and trade facilitation, trade in services, establishment and electronic commerce, etc. In the field of intellectual property of Korea-EU FTA there are regulations embodying copyright, the rights related to patents, trademarks, service marks, designs, etc. Especially among such regulations there are those related to injunction, which are Injunction(10.48) and Alternative Measure(10.49). These regulations go hand in glove with Patent Troll that makes much money only through infringement lawsuits or transfers and licenses of patent rights without manufacturing goods. That is,Patent Troll is only patent owner but has no intention to manufacture goods. In this case, we come to grips with big problem whether Patent Troll should be protected by the Patent Act or infringer should be protected by the public interest. Of course, according to Korea-EU FTA, it is Korea's decision whether Korea would provide that at the request of the person liable to be subject to the measures of injunction, the competent judicial authorities may order pecuniary compensation to be paid to the injured party instead of applying the measures of injunction. However, in the case of ordering pecuniary compensation as alternative measures, Korea-EU FTA requests that infringer acted unintentionally and without negligence, execution of the measures in question would cause him or her disproportionate harm and pecuniary compensation to the injured party appears reasonably satisfactory. So this study aims for examining carefully contents of Korea-EU FTA regarding regulation of injunction and alternative measures,deciding whether we would accept such regulations in Korea-EU FTA and suggesting proposal to amend the Patent Act in case of accepting such regulations.

발행기관:
과학기술법연구원
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.32430/ilst.2010.16.1.99
분류:
기타법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
특허권의 침해금지명령(Injunction)과 관련된 한-EU FTA의 내용 및 그 이행방안 | 과학기술법연구 2010 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI