애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문형사법연구2010.09 발행KCI 피인용 10

사후적 경합범과 법원의 양형재량권

The Concurrent Offences of the latter part of the Criminal Law § 37 and the Court's Discretionary Power in the Examination of an Offence

정준섭(숙명여자대학교)

22권 3호, 297~322쪽

초록

Regarding the punishment of the Concurrent Offences of the latter part of the Criminal Law § 37, the Criminal Law § 39 ① which was amended in 2005 rules "the sentence … can be decreased or exempted." On this article, the Supreme Court decided that the court could decrease or exempt. However, the Supreme court's decision seems to be inappropriate, considering both the purpose of the amendment of the Criminal Law § 39 and the equity of the Concurrent Offences of the former part of the Criminal Law § 37. In other words, what the court decides with "considering equity" means that the court should examine the view of equity in making sentence and decrease or exempt the sentence if the court finds that the sentence should be decreased or exempted. Therefore, it should be interpreted that the court should decrease or exempt the sentence, except that the sentence should be increased after deciding the sentence with "considering equity".

Abstract

Regarding the punishment of the Concurrent Offences of the latter part of the Criminal Law § 37, the Criminal Law § 39 ① which was amended in 2005 rules "the sentence … can be decreased or exempted." On this article, the Supreme Court decided that the court could decrease or exempt. However, the Supreme court's decision seems to be inappropriate, considering both the purpose of the amendment of the Criminal Law § 39 and the equity of the Concurrent Offences of the former part of the Criminal Law § 37. In other words, what the court decides with "considering equity" means that the court should examine the view of equity in making sentence and decrease or exempt the sentence if the court finds that the sentence should be decreased or exempted. Therefore, it should be interpreted that the court should decrease or exempt the sentence, except that the sentence should be increased after deciding the sentence with "considering equity".

발행기관:
한국형사법학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.21795/kcla.2010.22.3.297
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
사후적 경합범과 법원의 양형재량권 | 형사법연구 2010 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI