강도상해죄의 행위주체와 미수와 기수의 판단기준 - 준강도죄와의 비교를 통한 비판적 검토 -

According to the logical interpretation of the relevant provisions of the Criminal Code as well as dictionary definition of a robber, a robber in robbery resulting in a bodily injury means only the completed one except an attempted one. Hence, either the attempt or completion of robbery resulting in a bodily injury depends on whether the result of a bodily injury occurs or not. The above-mentioned propositions put forward the following four inferences: Firstly, when a completed robber causes a bodily injury, the robber is responsible for completion of robbery resulting in a bodily injury because a completed one is the subject of robbery resulting in a bodily injury. Secondly, when a completed robber causes no bodily injury, the robber is responsible for attempt of robbery resulting in a bodily injury because a completed one is the subject of robbery resulting in a bodily injury. Thirdly, when an attempted robber causes a bodily injury, despite powerful offences, the robber isn't responsible for attempt or completion of robbery resulting in a bodily injury but responsible for accumulative crimes of both the attempted robbery and completed bodily injury, because an attempted robber isn't the subject of robbery resulting in a bodily injury. Fourthly, when an attempted robber causes no bodily injury, despite powerful offences that may cause a bodily injury, the robber isn't responsible for the attempt or completion of robbery resulting in a bodily injury but responsible for accumulative crimes of both the attempted robbery and attempted bodily injury, because an attempted robber isn't the subject of robbery resulting in a bodily injury.