피고인과 피고인 아닌 자의 진술에 대한 증거법상의 몇 가지 문제

The eligibility of witness must be acknowledged without the need to separate the pleading of codefendants who are accomplices. It is reasonable for the scope of accomplice relationship or the substantial relevance which is basis of classifying whether or not to acknowledge the eligibility of witness to include the cases in which a possibility to pass on the criminal responsibilities among the codefendants exists objectively. A guarantee of an opportunity for the cross-examination is sufficient for the right of cross-examination as a prerequisite condition to acknowledge the admissibility of evidence of a court testimony of the codefendants who are accomplices. In regard to the codefendants who are accomplices,the admissibility of evidence should only be acknowledged when the testimony is made as a witness. Also, the protocol for a public trial which stipulates a testimony of the defendant made as a defendant of another case must be acknowledged the admissibility of evidence pursuant to the Clause 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Also, the protocol for a public trial which stipulates a testimony of a defendant in an accomplice relationship with the defendant concerned must be acknowledged its admissibility of evidence only when guaranteed a chance to cross-examine the accomplice as a witness. Furthermore, if the suspect who is an accomplice denies the contents of the interrogatory of the suspect drawned up by the police, it is reasonable to deny the admissibility of evidence regarding the defendant in the accomplice relationship.