애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문안암법학2011.01 발행KCI 피인용 2

중국 반독점법상 독점합의에 관한 고찰

A Study on the Monopoly Agreement in the Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law

김현아(고려대학교)

34호, 791~822쪽

초록

The exclusive agreement in China is defined as "an agreement, decision and other cooperative behavior which excludes or limit the competition between managers at competition." The Chinese Anti- Monopoly Law divides such an exclusive agreement into a horizontal exclusive agreement and a vertical exclusive agreement and lists under such a division and stipulates that what is included in such a listed type is violation. An agreement which is not included in the listed type but has a competitive limitation can be regulated if the implementing agency of the government recognizes it. In addition, the law has an application exemption stipulation if provided under a law reflecting a positive side of an exclusive agreement. It is pointed as an issue that the court cannot correct an error of the implementation agency. Since the stipulations related to an exclusive agreement regulate only what is in principle, the necessity of detailed guidelines is presented. As the Anti-Monopoly Law is implemented in China, it is highly possible that the Anti-Monopoly Law is positively applied to an exclusive agreement which met a difficulty with the implementation of the law due to lack of legal basis of the conventional laws. Countries around the world are favorable toward the trend of strengthening the implementation of the competition law, and it is a general prospect that in China too, the implementation of the Anti-Monopoly Law will strengthen the competition law against the violations of competition order in China. So, Korean enterprises should take every measure in preparation for the positive application of the Anti-Monopoly Law by checking the business practices done in the past.

Abstract

The exclusive agreement in China is defined as "an agreement, decision and other cooperative behavior which excludes or limit the competition between managers at competition." The Chinese Anti- Monopoly Law divides such an exclusive agreement into a horizontal exclusive agreement and a vertical exclusive agreement and lists under such a division and stipulates that what is included in such a listed type is violation. An agreement which is not included in the listed type but has a competitive limitation can be regulated if the implementing agency of the government recognizes it. In addition, the law has an application exemption stipulation if provided under a law reflecting a positive side of an exclusive agreement. It is pointed as an issue that the court cannot correct an error of the implementation agency. Since the stipulations related to an exclusive agreement regulate only what is in principle, the necessity of detailed guidelines is presented. As the Anti-Monopoly Law is implemented in China, it is highly possible that the Anti-Monopoly Law is positively applied to an exclusive agreement which met a difficulty with the implementation of the law due to lack of legal basis of the conventional laws. Countries around the world are favorable toward the trend of strengthening the implementation of the competition law, and it is a general prospect that in China too, the implementation of the Anti-Monopoly Law will strengthen the competition law against the violations of competition order in China. So, Korean enterprises should take every measure in preparation for the positive application of the Anti-Monopoly Law by checking the business practices done in the past.

발행기관:
안암법학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.22822/alr..34.201101.791
분류:
법학일반

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
중국 반독점법상 독점합의에 관한 고찰 | 안암법학 2011 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI