판결주문에서의 선정자 표시에 관한 연구

The plaintiffs or defendants could appoint one of them as an appointed party. The appointing parties will drop out of the lawsuit after appointing. But the judgement on the appointed party has an effect on the appointing parties. In some cases, the judges should present the appointing parties in the main sentence of the judgement. There is some mess in the court ruling practice on it. The target of this essay is to analyze the related issues and get rid of the mess. First, this essay touches the issue of how to present the appointing parties on the principal part of the judgement's main sentence. I consider the opinion to be meaningless that appointing parties should not been presented in the main sentence. When the plaintiff wins the case, regardless of fully or partly, the appointing parties should be presented in the main sentence. When the plaintiff loses the case, it is enough to present only the appointed party. Second, this essay studies on the main sentence of the lawsuit's costs, which is the most important in it. I suggest that the appointing parties could been presented in the main sentence of the lawsuit's costs. I show the mess happened in the court ruling's practice. To follow the main stream , the appointing parties should been presented when he is to have the standing in the procedure of fixing amount of costs of litigation. But, I don't think it is necessary. Third, this essay examines how to present the appointing parties in the main sentence of the appellate court's judgement. The appointing parties should not been presented in the principal part when the appeal is dismissed. This essay shows how to present accurately the appointing parties in the judgement's main sentence on the basis of the two principles. They are, ① accurateness and ② conciseness.