애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문경영법률2011.04 발행KCI 피인용 5

주주총회결의무효 및 부존재확인판결의 효력 -소의 법적 성격과 관련하여-

The Effect of a Final and Conclusive Judgment in Action for Affirming Nullity and Non-existence of Resolution

장완규(고려대학교)

21권 3호, 37~66쪽

초록

A final and conclusive judgment shall be binding on the parties in civil litigation(Civil Procedure Act Article 218(1)). But the judgment affirming nullity and non-existence of resolution(Commercial Act Article 380) shall be effective against any third person. Because Commercial Act Article 190 (the main sentence) shall apply mutatis mutandis in action for affirming nullity and non-existence of resolution. This is the exceptions of res judicata. Therefore, as compared with the effect of res judicata in Civil Procedure Act, we need to examine the judgment affirming nullity and non-existence of resolution in details. In this paper, I examine res judicata and I compare the judgment affirming nullity with the judgment non-existence of resolution.

Abstract

A final and conclusive judgment shall be binding on the parties in civil litigation(Civil Procedure Act Article 218(1)). But the judgment affirming nullity and non-existence of resolution(Commercial Act Article 380) shall be effective against any third person. Because Commercial Act Article 190 (the main sentence) shall apply mutatis mutandis in action for affirming nullity and non-existence of resolution. This is the exceptions of res judicata. Therefore, as compared with the effect of res judicata in Civil Procedure Act, we need to examine the judgment affirming nullity and non-existence of resolution in details. In this paper, I examine res judicata and I compare the judgment affirming nullity with the judgment non-existence of resolution.

발행기관:
한국경영법률학회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
주주총회결의무효 및 부존재확인판결의 효력 -소의 법적 성격과 관련하여- | 경영법률 2011 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI