현행 도시및주거환경정비법상 재개발 ․재건축조합설립추진위원회와 조합의 운영에 관한 一考察

It is important to review the procedures focusing on the legislation of urban rehabilitation as the adjective law for the ground. It is natural that the flaw under the procedure is the main content generally in the issues concerned. And, it is meaningful to analyze, review, and construct the content of the precedents, by the Supreme Court and lower courts, which may have important meaning, introducing the cases of recent precedents in this paper. There are many cases that the head and executives of the association do not show their credibility and fairness in executing the work, even though the roles of the chairman and members of promotion committee and the head and executives of the association are very important. In addition, it is often observed that the members of general meeting of the association, the highest resolution organization, is uninterested and, on the contrary, some members cannot present their opinion or execute their rights since they have no professional or legal knowledge to judge the situation of the project. All the issues until now would be solved by executing the system at a time. As optimistic prospect is earlier, the outcome of the system execution would be observed. Even if any policy is presented, justice, fitness of the purpose, and legal suitability are necessary for right values and the work process by the operation party. Finally, the mayor, the head of county or district should supervise and monitor the project completely with positive concern by organizing professional team to make successful rehabilitation work, not disregarding the point that the rehabilitation work is to contribute to the development of communities in the region.