애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문한국정책연구2011.06 발행KCI 피인용 4

지방소비세의 배분기준에 따른 지역간 세수추이 분석

Analyzing on Tax Revenue‘s Transition by Allocation Criteria of Local Consumption Tax

최길수(대전발전연구원); 설영훈(충북발전연구원)

11권 1호, 237~256쪽

초록

Local consumption and income taxes were introduced in 2010 as a resulted in insistence must be to facilitate of fiscal decentralization and strengthen of local government's financial power. Particularly, local consumption tax(LCT) is composed of five percent of value added tax possessed by central government. The LCT is allocated by a scale of "final consumption expenditure of household" among sixteen metropolitan cities and provinces. The purpose of this paper is to contribute in restructuring the allocation criteria of LCT in the future throughout analyzing how impact on sixteen metropolitan cities and provinces when applied five allocation criterion(①final consumption expenditure of household, ② population, ③ local income tax revenue per caper, ④ GRDP per caper, ⑤ labor force participation rate) of the LCT. The result of analyzing is not contribute for fiscal equalization among 16 regions as four allocation criterion(①,②,③,④) with the exception of "labor force participation rate(⑤)". Finally speaking, the innovation in allocation criteria of LCT should be focus on reducing the gap of LCT revenue among regions.

Abstract

Local consumption and income taxes were introduced in 2010 as a resulted in insistence must be to facilitate of fiscal decentralization and strengthen of local government's financial power. Particularly, local consumption tax(LCT) is composed of five percent of value added tax possessed by central government. The LCT is allocated by a scale of "final consumption expenditure of household" among sixteen metropolitan cities and provinces. The purpose of this paper is to contribute in restructuring the allocation criteria of LCT in the future throughout analyzing how impact on sixteen metropolitan cities and provinces when applied five allocation criterion(①final consumption expenditure of household, ② population, ③ local income tax revenue per caper, ④ GRDP per caper, ⑤ labor force participation rate) of the LCT. The result of analyzing is not contribute for fiscal equalization among 16 regions as four allocation criterion(①,②,③,④) with the exception of "labor force participation rate(⑤)". Finally speaking, the innovation in allocation criteria of LCT should be focus on reducing the gap of LCT revenue among regions.

발행기관:
경인행정학회
분류:
기타행정학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
지방소비세의 배분기준에 따른 지역간 세수추이 분석 | 한국정책연구 2011 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI