형법상 정당방위와 자구행위의 경합
A competition of self defense and self help in the criminal law
임석원(부경대학교)
1권 27호, 289~300쪽
초록
The purpose of this study is to find out the limit of self defense and the solution of competition. It is impossible for us to admit self defense without limit in actuality of criminal law if we take adequate notice of the benefit and protection of the law, the principle of propriety, and the principle of present. Taking this opportunity of this problems, went deep into the study of competition of justifications and security of effectiveness about self help in the criminal law of Korea. The results show that as follow:Firstly, the question of whether or not to admit self defense, is determined by the special feature by means of advance emergency act. It is impossible to shirk one's criminal responsibility about a revenge act. Secondly, we must not only know the difference between self defense and self help in the criminal justifications, but also judge by the standard under a special feature of the mutual supplementation which overcome weakness. This study shows how we will decide a standard of justifications between self defense and self help. Thirdly, we have to make full use of the self help by justification in a judicial precedent, because the self help is a fort which protect a claim, especially property right, from violation.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find out the limit of self defense and the solution of competition. It is impossible for us to admit self defense without limit in actuality of criminal law if we take adequate notice of the benefit and protection of the law, the principle of propriety, and the principle of present. Taking this opportunity of this problems, went deep into the study of competition of justifications and security of effectiveness about self help in the criminal law of Korea. The results show that as follow:Firstly, the question of whether or not to admit self defense, is determined by the special feature by means of advance emergency act. It is impossible to shirk one's criminal responsibility about a revenge act. Secondly, we must not only know the difference between self defense and self help in the criminal justifications, but also judge by the standard under a special feature of the mutual supplementation which overcome weakness. This study shows how we will decide a standard of justifications between self defense and self help. Thirdly, we have to make full use of the self help by justification in a judicial precedent, because the self help is a fort which protect a claim, especially property right, from violation.
- 발행기관:
- 동북아시아문화학회
- 분류:
- 학제간연구