정보제공의무의 체계적 지위에 관한 연구

About the explicit rules has no regulations the execution of a contract obligation to provide information in the Civil Code in Korea. However, the  Depending on the specific circumstances of the precedent and dogma faith regulation limited by resolution and, Civil Code Article 104 unfair legal practices, error cancellation, or Article 110 Article 109 Article fraud by clear and it can solve. But specifically, in some cases, the parties to the contract negotiations phase information is required to recognize its responsibility for breach of what the nature and content of the provisions on representation, and only if there is any relationship is unclear. Also in today's information society, information technology or knowledge simply is more than a superior position. Information even in the contractual relationship between the parties the contract worth a stay in an important position at the same time to determine the validity of contracts that may in fact be the case. Imbalance or asymmetry of information in real conditions, with skills and knowledge of the agreement between experts and amateurs in many cases, produce unfair results the structural unfairness. Of the contract by either party more than the other party due to information gaps, if unfavorable contracts has increased, the point these unjust and unreasonable contract to protect the parties from the study of legal reasoning is an important challenge. This paper are summarized provides information on the contract process to resolve issues related to duty on this look at the trends of foreign law, duty to provide information based on there cognition and systematic status, and duty to provide information and civilly, with a focus on the relationship between regulation, duty to provide information on the status of systematic analysis.