애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문성균관법학2011.08 발행KCI 피인용 10

개정 형사소송법 제316조에 대한 고찰 - 조사자 증언제도를 중심으로-

A Study on the Amended Code of Criminal Procedure 316

임웅(성균관대학교); 도규엽(한국방송통신대학교)

23권 2호, 211~235쪽

초록

One of the important parts of the Amended Criminal Procedure Law is specifying admissibility of investigator's testimony in the law. It is included in the Amended Code of Criminal Procedure 316 which is related to hearsay statements. However, as long as this code grants permission to bring document form of police officer’s or prosecutor’s report as well as investigator's testimony to a court as evidence, there is possibility that illegal investigation will be brought into being and the defendant’s right to defend himself will be being infringed. But if the Criminal Procedure Law of South Korea allows investigative agency party to use just testimonial evidence only, no document form of police officer’s or prosecutor’s report, as the way to set forth evidence, admissibility of investigator's testimony will play a role in protecting the suspect's human rights and the defendant’s right to defend himself and enhancing investigative environment in terms of transparency, due process, and fair trial. This is not only in accord with the intensification of court initiative which was the ultimate goal of reforming the Criminal Procedure Law in 2007, but also necessary for successful operation of jury trial system.

Abstract

One of the important parts of the Amended Criminal Procedure Law is specifying admissibility of investigator's testimony in the law. It is included in the Amended Code of Criminal Procedure 316 which is related to hearsay statements. However, as long as this code grants permission to bring document form of police officer’s or prosecutor’s report as well as investigator's testimony to a court as evidence, there is possibility that illegal investigation will be brought into being and the defendant’s right to defend himself will be being infringed. But if the Criminal Procedure Law of South Korea allows investigative agency party to use just testimonial evidence only, no document form of police officer’s or prosecutor’s report, as the way to set forth evidence, admissibility of investigator's testimony will play a role in protecting the suspect's human rights and the defendant’s right to defend himself and enhancing investigative environment in terms of transparency, due process, and fair trial. This is not only in accord with the intensification of court initiative which was the ultimate goal of reforming the Criminal Procedure Law in 2007, but also necessary for successful operation of jury trial system.

발행기관:
법학연구원
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.17008/skklr.2011.23.2.009
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
개정 형사소송법 제316조에 대한 고찰 - 조사자 증언제도를 중심으로- | 성균관법학 2011 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI