애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문상사법연구2011.11 발행KCI 피인용 2

한국채택국제회계기준상 연결실체의 판단기준에 대한 법리적 분석

A Legal Analysis of Criterion on Consolidated Entities under the K-IFRS

오수근(이화여자대학교)

30권 3호, 397~432쪽

초록

K-IFRS has come into effect since 2011. Internal auditors and outside auditors shall make reports on consolidated financial statements. Consolidated entities are to be selected first for that purpose. The author analyses ‘control’ and ‘de facto control’ which are the criterion in identifying consolidated entities from a legal view point. In addition, he deals with related issues including superior control, exemption of consolidation,affiliated company, joint venture and audit on subsidiary by an auditor of parent. Some practical points to be noted are presented as conclusion, (1) As control means decision making power in a legal context, it is deemed to have control if one has a voting power over 50%. However, it is not the case when the resolution requirement is tightened. (2) It is not counted as shares with voting power when voting power of nonvoting stocks is exceptionally revived, controlled company owns stocks of controlling company, and converting power is exercised during the shareholders’ list is closed. (3) Agreement on voting right, voting trust and assignment of voting power should be considered in counting voting rights. (4) The existence of voting right should be verified in case when a controlled company issues stock call option, convertible stock, convertible bond and redeemable share. (5) In order to prove the existence of control, several situation might be considered including distribution of shares and pattern of exercise of voting right. 30% of criteria under the Outside Audit Act should not be treated as an evidence in identifying the de facto control.

Abstract

K-IFRS has come into effect since 2011. Internal auditors and outside auditors shall make reports on consolidated financial statements. Consolidated entities are to be selected first for that purpose. The author analyses ‘control’ and ‘de facto control’ which are the criterion in identifying consolidated entities from a legal view point. In addition, he deals with related issues including superior control, exemption of consolidation,affiliated company, joint venture and audit on subsidiary by an auditor of parent. Some practical points to be noted are presented as conclusion, (1) As control means decision making power in a legal context, it is deemed to have control if one has a voting power over 50%. However, it is not the case when the resolution requirement is tightened. (2) It is not counted as shares with voting power when voting power of nonvoting stocks is exceptionally revived, controlled company owns stocks of controlling company, and converting power is exercised during the shareholders’ list is closed. (3) Agreement on voting right, voting trust and assignment of voting power should be considered in counting voting rights. (4) The existence of voting right should be verified in case when a controlled company issues stock call option, convertible stock, convertible bond and redeemable share. (5) In order to prove the existence of control, several situation might be considered including distribution of shares and pattern of exercise of voting right. 30% of criteria under the Outside Audit Act should not be treated as an evidence in identifying the de facto control.

발행기관:
한국상사법학회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
한국채택국제회계기준상 연결실체의 판단기준에 대한 법리적 분석 | 상사법연구 2011 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI