애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문성균관법학2011.12 발행KCI 피인용 8

현행 인터넷상 본인확인제에 대한 헌법적 평가

Constitutional Evaluation on Real-Name Identification System

지성우(성균관대학교)

23권 3호, 27~45쪽

초록

In modern democratic system Freedom of expression is a indispensible and essential element for the free explanation of the peoples and a basement of existence and development of a Nation. According to the "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights” everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kind, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice. The Constitution of the Republic of Korea guarantees fundamental human rights to freedom of expression. Article 21 of the Constitution states that (1) All citizens enjoy the freedom of speech and the press, and licensing of assembly and association may not be recognized. However, article §21 ④ provides that "neither nor the press may violate the honour or rights of other persons nor undermines public morals or social ethics”. In korea the political liberalization in the late 1980s led to loosening of media control by the Government, ushering in a period of rapid expansion of the sector and freedom of the press. Furthermore the expanding of the population accesses the Internet giving the country one of the highest broadband penetration in the world. In 2005, korea Government under §82 ⑥ of the 「Public Officials Election Act(POEA)」 and §44 ⑤ of the 「Information Telecommunication Network Act(ITNA)」 introduced the real-name identification system to identify an individual's name whenever he or she posts information or materials on the Internet, with the purported aim to ensure fairness of elections. In this paper is concerned about the impact of such identification systems to the rights to freedom of expression, which is rooted anonymity. Additionally recommends that the Government consider other means to identify a person and only if there is probable cause or reasonable doubt that the person to be identified has committed or is about to commit a crime.

Abstract

In modern democratic system Freedom of expression is a indispensible and essential element for the free explanation of the peoples and a basement of existence and development of a Nation. According to the "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights” everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kind, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice. The Constitution of the Republic of Korea guarantees fundamental human rights to freedom of expression. Article 21 of the Constitution states that (1) All citizens enjoy the freedom of speech and the press, and licensing of assembly and association may not be recognized. However, article §21 ④ provides that "neither nor the press may violate the honour or rights of other persons nor undermines public morals or social ethics”. In korea the political liberalization in the late 1980s led to loosening of media control by the Government, ushering in a period of rapid expansion of the sector and freedom of the press. Furthermore the expanding of the population accesses the Internet giving the country one of the highest broadband penetration in the world. In 2005, korea Government under §82 ⑥ of the 「Public Officials Election Act(POEA)」 and §44 ⑤ of the 「Information Telecommunication Network Act(ITNA)」 introduced the real-name identification system to identify an individual's name whenever he or she posts information or materials on the Internet, with the purported aim to ensure fairness of elections. In this paper is concerned about the impact of such identification systems to the rights to freedom of expression, which is rooted anonymity. Additionally recommends that the Government consider other means to identify a person and only if there is probable cause or reasonable doubt that the person to be identified has committed or is about to commit a crime.

발행기관:
법학연구원
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.17008/skklr.2011.23.3.002
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
현행 인터넷상 본인확인제에 대한 헌법적 평가 | 성균관법학 2011 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI