애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문국제거래법연구2011.12 발행KCI 피인용 4

M&A에 대한 각국의 기업결한 신고 및 심사제도와 사례

A Case Study on Antitrust Filing and Review System on M&As in Various Jurisdictions

신상훈(법무법인 (유)태평양)

20권 2호, 1~25쪽

초록

Antitrust filing and review system on M&As is an important part of competition laws in many jurisdictions. An antitrust filing should be made with competition authorities in various jurisdictions with a certain M&A if the parties to the M&A meet the merger filing threshold, which usually consists of the amount of global and local turnover and/or total assets of the respective parties. If a certain M&A is subject to the pre-closing filing obligation, the parties cannot consummate the M&A transaction during the waiting period. Gun-jumping (i.e., consummation before getting the clearance) is prohibited in most of the jurisdictions. In the merger review, the competition authorities starts with defining the relevant market which is affected by the M&A. The competition authorities consider various factors in assessing the anti-competitiveness of a particular M&A such as market concentration,unilateral and co-ordinated effects, new entry, existence of neighboring markets,efficiency and failing company defense. If an M&A is determined to have anti-competitive effect in any relevant market, the competition authorities may impose merger remedies including prohibition of the transaction, divestiture and/or certain behavioral remedies.

Abstract

Antitrust filing and review system on M&As is an important part of competition laws in many jurisdictions. An antitrust filing should be made with competition authorities in various jurisdictions with a certain M&A if the parties to the M&A meet the merger filing threshold, which usually consists of the amount of global and local turnover and/or total assets of the respective parties. If a certain M&A is subject to the pre-closing filing obligation, the parties cannot consummate the M&A transaction during the waiting period. Gun-jumping (i.e., consummation before getting the clearance) is prohibited in most of the jurisdictions. In the merger review, the competition authorities starts with defining the relevant market which is affected by the M&A. The competition authorities consider various factors in assessing the anti-competitiveness of a particular M&A such as market concentration,unilateral and co-ordinated effects, new entry, existence of neighboring markets,efficiency and failing company defense. If an M&A is determined to have anti-competitive effect in any relevant market, the competition authorities may impose merger remedies including prohibition of the transaction, divestiture and/or certain behavioral remedies.

발행기관:
국제거래법학회
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
M&A에 대한 각국의 기업결한 신고 및 심사제도와 사례 | 국제거래법연구 2011 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI