애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문형사법연구2011.12 발행KCI 피인용 3

야간주거침입절도죄에 있어서 야간에 행해져야 하는 행위

The Act which must be done at Night in Larceny committed by Trespassing into Dwelling at Night

김경락(대구외국어대학교)

23권 4호, 193~226쪽

초록

Firstly, the trespassing is the act which means that a doer is entering into the house opposing in the intention of the resident. On the other hand, the act which means that a doer is still staying to the house after he or she just entered into the house isn't the trespassing. The act which means that a doer is entering into the house opposing in the intention of the resident and the act which means that a doer is staying to the house after he or she just entered into the house are different concepts which must be distinguished. Secondly, the article 330 of the Korean Penal Code is providing that the person who trespasses into dwelling at night and steals the property of the others is punished with larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night. If we consider the construction form of this sentence, there isn't a possibility of saying that "at night" doesn't modify "trespassing" and only modifies "stealing". Thirdly, the article 330 of the Korean Penal Code which is providing that the person who trespasses into dwelling at night and steals the property of the others is punished with larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night consists of one sentence which is "trespassing into dwelling at night" and the other which is "stealing the property of the others". Consequently, in the process of the interpretation on the article 330 of the Korean Penal Code, the view that the act which must be done at night in larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night is "stealing", "trespassing or stealing" or "trespassing and stealing" isn't right. The act which must be done at night in larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night is "trespassing".

Abstract

Firstly, the trespassing is the act which means that a doer is entering into the house opposing in the intention of the resident. On the other hand, the act which means that a doer is still staying to the house after he or she just entered into the house isn't the trespassing. The act which means that a doer is entering into the house opposing in the intention of the resident and the act which means that a doer is staying to the house after he or she just entered into the house are different concepts which must be distinguished. Secondly, the article 330 of the Korean Penal Code is providing that the person who trespasses into dwelling at night and steals the property of the others is punished with larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night. If we consider the construction form of this sentence, there isn't a possibility of saying that "at night" doesn't modify "trespassing" and only modifies "stealing". Thirdly, the article 330 of the Korean Penal Code which is providing that the person who trespasses into dwelling at night and steals the property of the others is punished with larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night consists of one sentence which is "trespassing into dwelling at night" and the other which is "stealing the property of the others". Consequently, in the process of the interpretation on the article 330 of the Korean Penal Code, the view that the act which must be done at night in larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night is "stealing", "trespassing or stealing" or "trespassing and stealing" isn't right. The act which must be done at night in larceny committed by trespassing into dwelling at night is "trespassing".

발행기관:
한국형사법학회
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.21795/kcla.2011.23.4.193
분류:
법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
야간주거침입절도죄에 있어서 야간에 행해져야 하는 행위 | 형사법연구 2011 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI