住宅分讓保證人에 의해 完成된 建物의 所有權 歸屬 基準에 대한 硏究 ― 所有權 歸屬의 決定에 관한 合意를 中心으로 ―

Existing precedent and theory except subcontract did not give active position about mutual agreement that possession reversion of building under construction decides possession reversion between party in crystallization. But, we need to recognize widely consultation that decide possession reversion in extent that do not damage principle about real estate real right fluctuation. And, unanimity such as latitude active changing precedent about separate building of the Supreme Court to recognize extent of separate building mutual agreement that decide possession reversion doing in occasion that complete last process during plan process widely utilize need to. Therefore, we need to analyze article about possession reversion of building under construction at assurance casualty occurrence defining in offer sheet that is signed between Korea Housing Guarantee Co., LTD. and business subject actively by unanimity about possession reversion.