판례상 이사의 임무 해태 및 위반에 따른 배임죄 적용에 대한 검토

Director and outside director are to requirements of the times to discharge their duties. Obtain a seat on the board of directors have personality in circumspection. Director and outside director can take a different road if their disagree, but They should be careful when calling it into question and put up with any burden that may be caused by their decision. Director and outside director are to fulfillment with faithfully kept. Outside directors in the duty,cutoff the company resulted t bankrupt. Director and outside director are corruptible position. Director and outside director are apt to abuse their position. Therefore it require to restrain criminal law. But there are many problem. The first, civil affairs and criminal affairs is not distinguish clearly. The second, negligence of their duties link directly with commit a copycat crime. The third, copycat crime of director and outside director leave room for questions to relate breach of trust. This is relation to the sphere of activity. Sphere of activity in director must interpret a matter in a broad sense. Because it is a shortcut to lead the protection of property. The inflict severe punishment for breach of trust take a thing as security. This security will contribute greatly to the economic development and financial health of the management.