애스크로AIPublic Preview
← 학술논문 검색
학술논문과학기술법연구2012.05 발행KCI 피인용 1

공지된 구성요소를 치환하는 경우 발명의 진보성 판단에 관한 고찰

A study on the criteria for determining inventive step pursuant to substitution of known elements

김승조(법무법인(유)율촌)

18권 1호, 185~220쪽

초록

Determination of inventive step is the most important requirement for patentability. Korean Patent Law Article 29(2) describes "could easily have been made before the filing of a patent application by a person with ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains, the patent for such an invention may not be granted". The article is not complex, however, It is the most difficult to apply. Consequently, it is not possible to predict with certainty whether a given invention will meet the requirement. There are many issues on determining inventive step, such as the person skilled in the art, secondary consideration, hindsight. This paper reviews several cases related with substitution of known elements as well as the corresponding practices in the United States, EPO, and Japan, and looks for criteria determining inventive step when the known elements are substituted with others. Through out this process, this paper tries to find the way how to apply the criteria to the real cases.

Abstract

Determination of inventive step is the most important requirement for patentability. Korean Patent Law Article 29(2) describes "could easily have been made before the filing of a patent application by a person with ordinary skill in the art to which the invention pertains, the patent for such an invention may not be granted". The article is not complex, however, It is the most difficult to apply. Consequently, it is not possible to predict with certainty whether a given invention will meet the requirement. There are many issues on determining inventive step, such as the person skilled in the art, secondary consideration, hindsight. This paper reviews several cases related with substitution of known elements as well as the corresponding practices in the United States, EPO, and Japan, and looks for criteria determining inventive step when the known elements are substituted with others. Through out this process, this paper tries to find the way how to apply the criteria to the real cases.

발행기관:
과학기술법연구원
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.32430/ilst.2012.18.1.185
분류:
기타법학

AI 법률 상담

이 논문의 주제에 대해 더 알고 싶으신가요?

460만+ 법률 자료에서 관련 판례·법령·해석례를 찾아 답변합니다

AI 상담 시작
공지된 구성요소를 치환하는 경우 발명의 진보성 판단에 관한 고찰 | 과학기술법연구 2012 | AskLaw | 애스크로 AI